View Document Text
Form ADV Part 2A
Firm Brochure
Security Capital Research & Management
Incorporated
10 South Dearborn Street, 38th Floor
Chicago, IL 60603
(312) 385-8300
www.securitycapital.com
March 21, 2025
This brochure provides information about the qualifications and business practices of Security Capital Research &
Management Incorporated (“Security Capital” or the “Adviser”). If you have any questions about the contents of this
brochure, please contact us at (312) 385-8300. The information in this brochure has not been approved or verified by
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or by any state securities authority.
Additional information about Security Capital, including a copy of the Adviser's Form ADV Part 1A, is also available
on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.
Security Capital is registered as an investment adviser with the SEC. Such registration does not imply a certain level
of skill or training.
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
ITEM 2
Material Changes
This brochure ("Brochure") dated March 21, 2025 contains the following material changes since the last annual
update of the Brochure on March 26, 2024.
•
Item 8.B, Material, Significant, or Unusual Risks Relating to Investment Strategies, was updated as
follows:
◦
"Risks Associated with the Use of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") Tools" was added and "Data Sources
Risk" and "Cybersecurity Risk" were updated, to describe the risks associated with the use of AI
Tools.
◦
"Interest Rate Risk" was enhanced to further describe the risks associated with market changes
in interest rates.
•
Item 11.B, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Other Conflicts of Interest, was updated as
follows:
◦
The "Proprietary Investments by the Adviser and/or its Related Persons – Initial Funding and
Seed Investments" section was updated to describe the conflicts that arise when the Adviser or its
related persons acquires one or more investments in respect of a closed-end fund or client
account before the closing or funding date of such fund or account (each, a "Seed Investment").
◦
"Continuation Vehicle Considerations" section was added to describe the conflicts of interest
related to interests in an investment fund that is the subject of a continuation or restructuring
vehicle.
•
The "Account Errors and Resolutions" section within Item 12.B, was updated to clarify that the Adviser's
procedures applied to account errors, trade errors, and other operational mistakes and such procedures
generally require that errors caused by the Adviser and affecting a client's account be resolved promptly
and fairly subject to the considerations set forth.
In addition, although not material, certain disclosures throughout this Brochure have been amended. Clients
should carefully read this Brochure in its entirety.
For ease of reference, capitalized terms that are defined when first used in the Brochure are also set forth in the
Key Terms section.
2
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
ITEM 3
Table of Contents
2
3
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
8
9
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
12
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
ITEM 1 - Cover Page .......................................................................................................................................................
ITEM 2 - Material Changes .............................................................................................................................................
ITEM 3 - Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................
ITEM 4 - Advisory Business ............................................................................................................................................
A. General Description of Advisory Firm ............................................................................................................
B. Description of Advisory Services ....................................................................................................................
C. Availability of Customized Services for Individual Clients ..........................................................................
D. Wrap Fee Programs .........................................................................................................................................
E. Assets Under Management .............................................................................................................................
ITEM 5 - Fees and Compensation .................................................................................................................................
A. Advisory Fees and Compensation .................................................................................................................
B. Payment of Fees ...............................................................................................................................................
C. Additional Fees and Expenses .......................................................................................................................
D. Prepayment of Fees .........................................................................................................................................
E. Additional Compensation and Conflicts of Interest .....................................................................................
ITEM 6 - Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management ......................................................................
A. Performance-Based Fees ...............................................................................................................................
B. Side-by-Side Management and Potential Conflicts of Interest ..................................................................
ITEM 7 - Types of Clients ................................................................................................................................................
ITEM 8 - Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss .................................................................
A. Methods of Analysis and Investment Strategies ..........................................................................................
B. Material, Significant, or Unusual Risks Relating to Investment Strategies ..............................................
C. Risks Associated with Particular Types of Securities .................................................................................
ITEM 9 - Disciplinary Information ...................................................................................................................................
A. Criminal or Civil Proceedings .........................................................................................................................
B. Administrative Proceedings Before Regulatory Authorities .......................................................................
C. Self-Regulatory Organization (“SRO”) Proceedings ...................................................................................
ITEM 10 - Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations ....................................................................................
A. Broker-Dealer Registration Status .................................................................................................................
B. Futures Commission Merchant, Commodity Pool Operator, or Commodity Trading Advisor
18
18
19
20
20
20
28
28
30
31
31
32
32
32
32
32
Registration Status ...........................................................................................................................................
C. Material Relationships or Arrangements with Affiliated Entities ................................................................
D. Material Conflicts of Interest Relating to Other Investment Advisers .......................................................
ITEM 11 - Code of Ethics, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Personal Trading ......................
A. Code of Ethics and Personal Trading ............................................................................................................
B. Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Other Conflicts of Interest ......................................
ITEM 12 - Brokerage Practices ......................................................................................................................................
A. Factors Considered in Selecting or Recommending Broker-Dealers for Client Transactions ..............
B. Order Aggregation ............................................................................................................................................
ITEM 13 - Review of Accounts .......................................................................................................................................
A. Frequency and Nature of Review of Client Accounts .................................................................................
B. Factors Prompting Review of Client Accounts Other than a Periodic Review ........................................
C. Content and Frequency of Account Reports to Clients ..............................................................................
ITEM 14 - Client Referrals and Other Compensation .................................................................................................
A. Economic Benefits Received from Third Parties for Providing Services to Clients ...............................
B. Compensation to Non-Supervised Persons for Client Referrals ...............................................................
3
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
33
33
34
34
36
36
36
36
37
ITEM 15 - Custody ...........................................................................................................................................................
ITEM 16 - Investment Discretion ...................................................................................................................................
ITEM 17 - Voting Client Securities .................................................................................................................................
A. Policies and Procedures Relating to Voting Client Securities ...................................................................
B. No Authority to Vote Client Securities and Client Receipt of Proxies .......................................................
ITEM 18 - Financial Information .....................................................................................................................................
A. Balance Sheet ...................................................................................................................................................
B. Financial Conditions Likely to Impair Ability to Meet Contractual Commitments to Clients ..................
Key Terms ..........................................................................................................................................................................
4
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
ITEM 4
Advisory Business
A. Description of Advisory Firm
This Brochure relates to the investment advisory services offered by Security Capital Research & Management
Incorporated (“Security Capital” or the “Adviser”). Security Capital is registered with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended (the “Advisers Act”). Security Capital, together with 55I, LLC, Bear Stearns Asset Management Inc.,
Campbell Global, LLC, Highbridge Capital Management, LLC, J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc.,
J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., JPMorgan Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, JPMorgan Asset
Management (UK) Limited, JPMorgan Funds Limited, each an SEC registered investment adviser, various
affiliated foreign investment advisers and the asset management division of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
comprise the Asset Management ("AM") business of J.P. Morgan Asset & Wealth Management ("JPMAWM"). J.P.
Morgan Asset Management ("JPMAM") is the marketing name for the AM businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
and its affiliates worldwide (“JPMC”). JPMC is a publicly traded global financial services firm.
JPMorgan Asset Management Holdings Inc., which is a subsidiary of JPMC, owns all the common stock of
Security Capital. Security Capital was incorporated in Delaware on December 30, 1996.
B. Description of Advisory Services
Security Capital is a boutique investment management company with an exclusive focus on investments in
publicly traded real estate securities. Security Capital's three-member Portfolio Management Team (“PMT”)
makes all investment decisions. The PMT evaluates all real estate research, company specific analysis and
recommendations presented by the Research & Analysis, and Portfolio Analytics & Execution teams in order to
identify investments that present the greatest opportunity to achieve the objectives of the specific strategy. The
PMT members, Anthony R. Manno Jr., Kevin W. Bedell, and Nathan J. Gear, together have a combined average
of over 37 years of real estate and capital markets experience.
The Adviser’s advisory services are offered on both a discretionary and non-discretionary basis through a variety
of investment vehicles and arrangements, depending on the strategy, as further described below.
Separately Managed Accounts
The Adviser offers investment advisory services to institutional and high net worth clients through separately
managed accounts ("SMAs"). Clients typically retain the Adviser pursuant to an investment advisory agreement
between the Adviser and the client. The Adviser offers SMAs in many of its investment strategies. When the
Adviser contracts with a client for a discretionary SMA, the Adviser generally has the authority to execute trades
for the client's account. A client typically consults with the Adviser during the negotiation of the investment
advisory agreement, prior to funding its account, to create investment guidelines for the client's account.
Investment guidelines for SMAs are typically customized to each specific client account and such guidelines may
vary significantly among SMAs within the same strategy or with the same investment objective.
Sub-Advisory Accounts
Sub-advisory services are offered to institutional clients (including third party mutual funds) where the Adviser
contracts with an affiliated or unaffiliated investment adviser to provide investment advice on a discretionary basis.
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
The Adviser offers investment advisory services to other pooled investment vehicles across its various strategies.
These other pooled investment vehicles include private funds. Investors generally invest directly in a pooled
investment vehicle via a subscription agreement but, in certain instances, will contract with the Adviser for an
investment. Pooled investment vehicles managed by the Adviser are managed in accordance with each vehicle's
5
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
investment guidelines and restrictions and are generally not tailored to the individual needs of any particular
investor.
C. Availability of Customized Services for Individual Clients
Security Capital typically makes investments for clients in accordance with written investment guidelines or other
investment specific documentation for each advisory mandate. Investment services may be tailored for each
client’s specific needs and objectives, and typically include restrictions or limits on investments in certain
securities or types of securities. Security Capital has procedures and controls to monitor compliance with each
client’s investment guidelines.
Where Security Capital is the investment adviser to a pooled investment vehicle, investment objectives, guidelines
and any investment restrictions generally are not tailored to the needs of individual investors in those vehicles, but
rather are described in the prospectus or other relevant offering document for the vehicle.
D. Wrap Fee Programs
Security Capital's investment advisory services are currently not offered through any wrap fee programs.
E. Assets Under Management
As of December 31, 2024, Security Capital had assets under management in the amounts set forth below:
Assets Under Management
U.S. Dollar Amount
Assets Managed on a Discretionary Basis
$3,773,836,803
Assets Managed on a Non-Discretionary Basis
$0
Total Regulatory Assets Under Management
$3,773,836,803
ITEM 5
Fees and Compensation
A. Advisory Fees and Compensation
Separately Managed Accounts
Clients generally pay an advisory fee based on a percentage of the market value of the assets managed by the
Adviser. Such fee is referred to as an asset-based fee. To the extent permitted under the Advisers Act, the
Adviser also charges performance-based compensation with respect to certain strategies and products or as
otherwise agreed with specific clients. For an additional discussion of performance-based compensation, please
refer to Item 6.A, Performance-Based Fees, which addresses how performance-based compensation is
calculated.
The Adviser’s fee schedule may vary depending on the type of managed account. The standard annual fee
schedule for the most often utilized investment strategies is set forth below.
6
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Assets Under Management
Fee as a % of Assets
$ 10,000,000
$ 40,000,000
$ 50,000,000
$ 100,000,000
1.10%
1.00%
0.75%
0.60%
First
Next
Next
Over
Minimum investment: $10,000,000
Fee schedules are available upon request for other investment products, and strategies. Fees for products and
strategies may be higher or lower than the standard fee schedule.
In certain circumstances, fees may be negotiable. On occasion, the Adviser agrees to charge clients fees for
advisory services that are lower than those set forth above or other fee schedules. In certain circumstances in
which the Adviser or its "Affiliates" (as defined in Key Terms) provide customized investment advisory services or
other services in addition to investment advisory services, a higher fee schedule may apply. For certain
strategies, the Adviser may charge a minimum annual asset-based fee or require a minimum AUM for managing
an account. Accordingly, higher fees may also apply if an account’s assets are below the minimum investment
level indicated in the standard fee schedule. Variations in fees charged to clients can occur as a result of
numerous factors including, negotiations and/or discussions that may include the particular circumstances of the
investor, account size, investment strategy, account servicing requirements, the size and scope of the overall
relationship with the Adviser and its Affiliates or certain consultants, or as may be otherwise agreed with specific
clients on a case-by-case basis.
Investment Companies and Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
Investment Companies Sub-Advised by the Adviser
The prospectus of each investment company sub-advised by the Adviser sets forth the applicable fees and
expenses.
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
With respect to private funds managed by the Adviser, the applicable fees and expenses are set forth in the
relevant offering or governing documents. In certain cases, the Adviser will waive or reduce fees and expenses
for certain investors, including affiliates of the Adviser and/or employees of the Adviser or its affiliates.
The private funds managed by the Adviser typically utilize an asset-based fee of 1.00% of the average invested
assets of each fund. They do not currently charge performance-based compensation or carried interest, though
they may in the future.
In certain cases, investors pay fees outside the fund. Such fees are based on a separate fee agreement between
the Adviser and/or its Affiliates and the applicable investor. Investors should refer to the offering documents of the
relevant private fund or applicable fee agreement for further information with respect to fees.
B. Payment of Fees
Separately Managed Accounts
For separate accounts, clients may elect to have the Adviser bill the client for the advisory fees incurred, or the
client may instead agree to instruct its custodian to deduct advisory fees directly from the client’s separate
account. The Adviser typically charges fees after services have been rendered, at the end of each calendar
quarter.
7
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Investment Companies and Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
A description of the calculation and payment of fees payable to the Adviser is set forth in the applicable
prospectus, offering or governing document or fee agreement for the relevant fund. Clients should refer to such
documents for further information with respect to fees.
C. Additional Fees and Expenses
General
In addition to the advisory fees described above, clients may be subject to other fees and expenses in connection
with Security Capital's advisory services.
Transaction Charges
Clients generally pay brokerage commissions, taxes, charges and other costs related to the purchase and sale of
securities for a client’s account. See Item 12, Brokerage Practices for additional information regarding the
Adviser’s brokerage practices.
Custody and Other Fees
Clients typically establish a custody account under a separate agreement with a custodian bank, and the client
will incur a separate custody fee for the custodian’s services. The custodian may be an Affiliate of the Adviser. If
a client’s account is invested in mutual funds or other pooled investment vehicles, including private funds, the
client’s account generally will bear its pro-rata share of the expenses of the fund, including custody fees.
Common Types of Expenses Related to Private Funds
Clients investing in private funds may either directly or through allocations by the Adviser, bear the following
expenses:
(i)
All organizational and offering expenses;
(ii)
The costs, fees, or expenses, including any interest expenses, incurred in respect of any credit
facility, including any subscription line credit facility;
(iii)
The costs, fees, or expenses of all brokers, accountants, tax advisers, administrators, lawyers,
investment bankers, consultants, underwriters, auditors, valuation advisers, calculation agents and
other professional advisers or experts who are engaged in relation to the operation of the fund or
any investment;
(iv)
All costs, fees, or expenses associated with the preparation and filing of any combined or composite
financial or tax return on behalf of the investors;
(v)
The costs, fees, or expenses incurred in connection with making any filings with any governmental or
regulatory authority;
(vi)
The costs, fees, or expenses incurred in threatening, making, defending, investigating or settling any
claim, counterclaim, demand, action, suit or proceedings of any kind or nature (including legal and
accounting fees and expenses, costs of investigation incurred in making, defending or settling any of
the same);
(vii)
Insurance premiums (including without limitation any premiums for director and officer insurance and
professional indemnity insurance in respect of any director, officer, or employee of the Adviser or any
of its Affiliates in relation to such a person acting as a director, officer, or employee of any fund entity
in relation to, or in connection with, the fund or any investment), claims and expenses, including the
advancement thereof, and legal fees, disbursements, and governmental fees and charges
associated therewith;
8
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
(viii)
The costs, fees, or expenses relating to marketing the fund to potential investors, including the costs,
fees, or expenses associated with registering the fund for marketing in certain jurisdictions, any
translations of the fund prospectus and constituent documents and any side letters with investors;
(ix)
The costs, fees, or expenses relating to the establishment, operation, re-organization, termination,
dissolution and/or liquidation of any fund entity, except to the extent that the constituent documents
for any such entity provide to the contrary that any such costs, fees and expenses are to be borne by
the investors in such entity;
(x)
Any statutory or regulatory fees, if any, levied against or in respect of any fund entity, together with
the costs incurred in preparing any such submission required by any tax, statutory, or regulatory
authority or agency;
(xi)
Any taxation, fees, or other governmental charges levied against any fund entity and all expenses
incurred in connection with any audit, investigation, settlement, or review of any fund entity subject to
applicable law;
(xii)
The costs, fees, or expenses incurred by each unaffiliated board (if any) including the reasonable
travel, lodging, dining and other expenses for attending the annual, quarterly and other meetings
thereof in person and the director fees of such directors;
(xiii)
The costs, fees, or expenses of the administrator, the custodian, the depositary, the transfer agent,
or any other fund service providers who are engaged in respect of the operation of the fund
(including Affiliates of the Adviser who provide such services);
(xiv)
Reasonable out-of-pocket travel, lodging and similar expenses incurred by the Adviser, or any other
JPMC entity or their respective directors, officers, or employees arising from the acquisition,
ownership, operation or disposal of any investment (in the case of a proposed Investment, whether
or not actually acquired, or in the case of an existing investment, whether or not actually disposed of)
or other operation of the fund;
(xv)
Any costs, fees, or expenses incurred to alter or modify the structure of the fund (including in order to
comply with any anticipated or applicable regulation or law or to enable the fund to operate in a more
efficient manner).
The foregoing examples of expenses related to private funds is not exhaustive and should not be taken to be
inclusive of all costs, fees and expenses associated with or viewed as exclusive to such private funds.
For details on private fund expenses of the private funds advised by an Adviser, please refer to the offering
documents for such funds.
Expense Allocation
Expenses periodically will be incurred by multiple private funds. The Adviser allocates aggregate costs among the
applicable private funds in accordance with allocation policies and procedures, which are designed to allocate
expenses in a fair and equitable manner over time among such private funds. Under its current expense allocation
policies, the Adviser generally allocates the expense among the private funds on a pro rata basis based on assets
under management.
D. Prepayment of Fees
Separately Managed Accounts
The Adviser charges its advisory fee to institutional separately managed account clients in arrears; such fees are
not paid in advance.
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
Pooled investment vehicles managed by the Adviser pay asset-based fees. These fees are not paid in advance.
9
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
E. Additional Compensation and Conflicts of Interest
Neither the Adviser nor any of its "Supervised Persons" (as defined in Key Terms) accepts compensation for the
sale of securities or other investment products.
ITEM 6
Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management
A. Performance-Based Fees
Clients of Security Capital pay various types of fees for investment advisory services. For example, institutional
account fees may be determined on a fixed rate, sliding scale, or incentive basis. Most client accounts are
charged fees based on a percentage of assets under management. Certain accounts are charged an incentive or
performance-based fee together with, or in lieu of, an asset-based fee. Generally, performance-based fees are
calculated on the appreciation of a client’s assets or performance relative to a specified benchmark or return
threshold.
B. Side-by-Side Management and Potential Conflicts of Interest
Security Capital portfolio managers simultaneously manage accounts that are charged performance-based fees
and accounts that are charged asset-based fees. The portfolio managers of these accounts utilize substantially
similar investment strategies and invest in substantially similar assets for both account types. This portfolio
management relationship is often referred to as side-by-side management. Accounts that pay performance-based
fees reward the Adviser based on the performance in those accounts. As a result, performance-based fee
arrangements likely provide a heightened incentive for portfolio managers to make investments that present a
greater potential for return but which may also offer a greater risk of loss. On the other hand, compared to a
performance-based fee account, the Adviser may engage in relatively safer investments when managing accounts
that pay asset-based fees. The side-by-side management of accounts that pay performance-based fees and
accounts that only pay an asset-based fee creates a conflict of interest because there is an inherent incentive for
the portfolio manager to favor accounts with the potential to receive greater fees. For example, a portfolio
manager will be faced with a conflict of interest when allocating scarce investment opportunities given the
possibility of greater fees from accounts that pay performance-based fees as opposed to accounts that do not pay
performance-based fees. To address these types of conflicts, Security Capital has adopted policies and
procedures pursuant to which investment opportunities will be allocated among clients with similar strategies in a
manner that Security Capital believes is fair and equitable over time. For a detailed discussion of how Security
Capital addresses allocation conflicts, please see the Conflicts of Interest Created by Contemporaneous Trading
section within Item 11.B.
To further manage these potential conflicts of interest, where applicable, the Adviser monitors accounts within the
same strategy in an effort to ensure performance is consistent across accounts. For additional information
regarding the Adviser’s review process please see Item 13.A, Review of Accounts.
ITEM 7
Types of Clients
The Adviser primarily provides investment advisory services to institutional and retail clients, both U.S. and non-
U.S. clients, including:
•
Charitable and/or religious organizations
•
Corporations
10
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
•
Defined contribution and defined benefit pension plans
•
Endowments and foundations
•
Financial institutions
•
High net worth individuals
•
Insurance companies
•
Investment companies (including mutual funds and closed-end funds)
• Other pooled investment vehicles (including private funds)
•
State and local governments
• Other trusts
Account Requirements
The Adviser has established minimum account requirements for certain client accounts, which vary based on the
investment vehicle (separate account or fund), investment strategy, and asset class. In addition, a larger
minimum account balance may be required for certain types of accounts that require extensive administrative
effort. Minimums are subject to waiver in the Adviser's discretion. To open or maintain an account, clients are
required to sign an investment advisory agreement with Security Capital that stipulates the terms under which
Security Capital is authorized to act on behalf of the client to manage the assets listed in the agreement. In
certain instances, Security Capital may also manage the assets of an Affiliate’s clients and will receive from the
Affiliate a portion of the fee or other compensation paid by the end client for such services. Under these
circumstances, the client enters into an investment advisory agreement with the Affiliate and, in turn, the Affiliate
delegates authority to Security Capital.
For certain types of private investment funds offered or managed by the Adviser, U.S. investors must generally
satisfy certain investor sophistication requirements, including that the client qualifies as an “accredited investor”
under Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and a “qualified purchaser”
within the meaning of section 2(a)(51) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
The Adviser may also permit investments by certain employees that qualify as "knowledgeable employees"
within the meaning of Rule 3c-5 of the 1940 Act in lieu of satisfying the client qualification requirements
associated with being a "qualified purchaser".
ITEM 8
Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss
A. Methods of Analysis and Investment Strategies
Security Capital employs a bottom-up investment process combining active fieldwork, interaction with real estate
company management, scrutiny of public filings, and detailed cash flow analysis. Security Capital’s primary
valuation tool is a five-year discounted cash flow model tailored to each company and the properties owned by
that company. Security Capital’s Research & Analysis team and Portfolio Analytics & Execution team analyze the
amount, predictability, volatility, transparency, and sustainability of cash flow generated by a company and its
properties, as well as its growth potential over an anticipated holding period. The investment process analyzes all
investment opportunities using the same strict underwriting criteria, and on an ongoing basis, is used to monitor
existing investment positions. Security Capital’s Portfolio Management Team directs all investment decisions and
oversees the investment process.
Security Capital offers investment strategies with objectives across a risk-return spectrum, including: capital
preservation, current income, index relative, targeted and return-seeking. Additionally, Security Capital strategies
are Environmental, Social, and Governance ("ESG") integrated and, as such, Security Capital considers
financially material ESG information as part of the investment decision-making process with the goals of
managing risk and improving long-term returns/value. As the Adviser's approach to ESG integration focuses on
11
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
financial materiality, not all factors are relevant to a particular investment, asset class, or strategy. In addition,
ESG integration is dependent on the availability of sufficient ESG information relevant to the applicable
investment universe. The portion of investments for which the Adviser will consider financially material ESG
factors is therefore dependent on the investment universe of the strategy. ESG factors may be considered only
for certain investments and may not be considered for each and every investment decision.
B. Material, Significant, or Unusual Risks Relating to Investment Strategies
The investment strategies utilized by the Adviser depend on the requirements of the client and the investment
guidelines associated with the client’s account. Each strategy is subject to material risks. An account or fund may
not achieve its objective if the Adviser’s expectations regarding particular securities or markets are not met. Any
investment includes the risk of loss, and there can be no guarantee that a particular level of return will be
achieved.
Set forth below are some of the material risk factors that are often associated with the investment strategies and
types of investments relevant to the Adviser’s clients. This is only a summary. The information included in this
Brochure does not include every potential risk associated with each investment strategy or applicable to a
particular client account. It is impossible to identify all the risks associated with investing and the particular risks
applicable to a client account will depend on the nature of the account, its investment strategy or strategies, and
the types of securities held. While the Adviser seeks to manage accounts so that risks are appropriate to the
strategy, it is often impossible or not desirable to fully mitigate risks. Clients should understand that they could
lose some or all of their investment and should be prepared to bear the risk of such potential losses. Clients
should not rely solely on the descriptions provided below and should carefully read all applicable informational
materials and offering or governing documents prior to retaining the Adviser to manage an account or investing in
any "JPMorgan Affiliated Funds" (as defined in Key terms). Clients are urged to ask questions regarding risk
factors applicable to a particular strategy or investment product, read all product-specific risk disclosures and
determine whether a particular investment strategy or type of security is suitable for their account in light of their
specific circumstances, investment objectives and financial situation.
In the case of JPMorgan Affiliated Funds, the risk factors associated with the relevant fund’s investment strategy
are disclosed in the prospectus, offering memorandum, governing documents, or other materials of the fund.
Prospective investors should carefully read the relevant offering documents and consult with their own counsel
and advisers as to all matters concerning an investment in a fund.
General Portfolio Risks
General Market Risk. Economies and financial markets throughout the world are becoming increasingly
interconnected, which increases the likelihood that events or conditions in one country or region will adversely
impact markets or issuers in other countries or regions. Securities in any one strategy may underperform in
comparison to general financial markets, a particular financial market or other asset classes, due to a number of
factors, including inflation (or expectations for inflation), deflation (or expectations for deflation), interest rates,
global demand for particular products or resources, market instability, debt crises and downgrades, embargoes,
tariffs, sanctions and other trade barriers, regulatory events, other governmental trade or market control
programs, and related geopolitical events. In addition, the value of a strategy's investments may be negatively
affected by the occurrence of global events such as war, terrorism, environmental disasters, natural disasters or
events, country instability, and infectious disease epidemics or pandemics.
The effects of any future pandemic or other global event to business and market conditions may have a significant
negative impact on the performance of the separately managed accounts and fund investments, increase
separately managed account and fund volatility, exacerbate preexisting political, social, and economic risks to
separately managed accounts and funds, and negatively impact broad segments of businesses and populations.
In addition, governments, their regulatory agencies, or self-regulatory organizations have taken or may take
actions in response to a pandemic or other global event that affect the instruments in which a separately managed
account or funds invest, or the issuers of such instruments, in ways that could have a significant negative impact
on such account or fund’s investment performance. The ultimate impact of any pandemic or other global event
and the extent to which the associated conditions and governmental responses impact a separately managed
account or fund will also depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, difficult to accurately predict
12
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
and subject to frequent changes.Regulatory Risk. Pending and ongoing regulatory reform may have a significant
impact on the Adviser's investment advisory business.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ("Dodd-Frank"), as amended, added
Section 13 to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the "BHCA") and its implementing regulations (together the
"Volcker Rule") under which a "banking entity" (including the Adviser and its Affiliates) is restricted from acquiring
or retaining, as principal, any equity, partnership or other ownership interest in, or sponsoring, a “covered
fund” (which is defined to include certain pooled investment vehicles) unless the investment or activity is
conducted in accordance with an exclusion or exemption. The Volcker Rule’s asset management exemption
permits a banking entity, such as the Adviser, to invest in or sponsor a covered fund, subject to satisfaction of
certain requirements, which include, among other things, that a banking entity only hold a de minimis interest (no
more than 3% of the total number or value of the outstanding ownership interests) in the covered fund following
an initial seeding period of one year, and that only directors and employees directly engaged in providing
investment advisory or other qualifying services to the covered fund are permitted to invest. In addition, the
Volcker Rule generally prohibits a banking entity from engaging in transactions that would cause it or its Affiliates
to have credit exposure to a covered fund managed or advised by the banking entity or its Affiliates; that would
involve or result in a material conflict of interest between the banking entity and its clients, customers or
counterparties; or that would result, directly or indirectly, in a material exposure by the banking entity to high-risk
assets or high-risk trading strategies. These restrictions could materially adversely affect accounts that are, or are
invested in, covered funds, because the restrictions could limit a covered fund from obtaining seed capital, loans
or other commercial benefits from the Adviser or its Affiliates. As a result, the Volcker Rule impacts the method by
which the Adviser seeds, invests in and operates its funds, including private equity funds and hedge funds.
In June 2020, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve"), the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Company, the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission ("CFTC"), and the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted a final rule revising the Volcker
Rule’s provisions relating to covered funds, including modifying existing, and adopting new exclusions from the
definition of “covered fund.” The revised rule became effective on October 1, 2020. The ultimate impact of these
revisions to the Volcker Rule, including whether the Adviser may seek to rely on these new exclusions with
respect to existing funds or new funds depends on, among other things, the investment strategy of the funds and
development of market practice and standards. The Adviser may seek to restructure its funds to comply with
applicable laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, the Volcker Rule. Any restructuring would be
designed to enable the funds to carry out their investment objectives and otherwise accommodate the interests of
investors in those funds as a whole, while complying with the Volcker Rule.
While the vast majority of U.S. and non-U.S. regulations of derivatives and similar instruments arising from the
2008 financial crisis have been implemented, governments continue to assess and are likely to adjust such
regulations and require changes in market practices, These developments may increase the cost of derivatives
trading (whether through increased margin requirements, less favorable pricing, or other means), the eligibility of
the Adviser and J.P. Morgan Affiliated Funds and client accounts to transact in such products, and the market
availability of such products. As a result, the Adviser's management of funds and accounts that use and trade
swaps and derivatives may be adversely impacted.
Similarly, the Adviser’s management of funds and accounts that use and trade swaps and derivatives may be
adversely impacted by adopted changes to CFTC and other regulations. Other jurisdictions outside the United
States in which the Adviser operates may also adopt and implement regulations that could have a similar impact
on the Adviser and the broader markets.
Under the BHCA, if a fund were deemed to be controlled by the Adviser or an Affiliate, investments by such fund
would be subject to limitations under the BHCA that are substantially similar to those applicable to JPMC. Such
limitations would place certain restrictions on the fund’s investments in non-financial companies. These
restrictions would include limits on the ability of the fund to be involved in the day-to-day management of the
underlying non-financial company and limitations on the period of time that the fund could retain its investment in
such company. In addition, the fund, together with interests held by JPMC, may be limited from owning or
controlling, directly or indirectly, interests in third parties that exceed 5% of any class of voting securities or 25% of
total equity. These limitations may have a material adverse effect on the activities of the relevant fund.
13
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Foreign regulators have passed, and it is expected that they will continue to pass, legislation and changes that
may affect certain clients. The Adviser may take certain actions to limit its authority in respect of client accounts to
reduce the impact of regulatory restrictions on the Adviser or its clients.
In addition, there have been legislative, tax and regulatory changes and proposed changes that may apply to the
activities of the Adviser that may require legal, tax and regulatory changes, including requirements to provide
additional information pertaining to a client account to the Internal Revenue Service or other taxing authorities.
Regulatory changes and restrictions imposed by regulators, self-regulatory organizations ("SROs") and
exchanges vary from country to country and may affect the value of client investments and their ability to pursue
their investment strategies. Any such rules, regulations and other changes, and any uncertainty in respect of their
implementation, may result in increased costs, reduced profit margins and reduced investment and trading
opportunities, all of which may negatively impact performance.
Risks Associated with the Use of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") Tools. The Adviser may rely on programs and
systems that utilize AI, machine learning, probabilistic modeling, and other data science technologies ("AI Tools").
AI Tools are highly complex, and may be flawed, hallucinate, reflect biases included in the data on which such
tools are trained, be of poor quality, or be otherwise harmful. The Adviser typically incorporates human oversight
to reduce the risk of acting on potentially defective outputs. AI Tools present Data Sources Risk, Cybersecurity
Risk, and Model Risk (as further described below). The U.S. and global legal and regulatory environment relating
to the use of AI Tools is uncertain and rapidly evolving, and could require changes in the Adviser’s implementation
of AI Tools and increase compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance. Further, the Adviser may rely on AI
Tools developed by third parties, and the Adviser may have limited visibility over the accuracy and completeness
of such AI Tools.
Data Sources Risk. Although the Adviser obtains data, including alternative data, and information from third-party
sources that it considers to be reliable, the Adviser does not warrant or guarantee the availability, accuracy,
timeliness, and/or completeness of any data or information provided by these sources. The Adviser has controls
for certain data that, among other things, consider the representations of such third parties with regard to the
provision of data in compliance with applicable laws. The Adviser does not make any express or implied
warranties of any kind with respect to such third-party data. The Adviser shall not have any liability for any errors
or omissions in connection with any data obtained from third-party sources.
AI Tools often use data feeds from a number of sources. If those data feeds or formats become corrupted,
compromised, or discontinued in any material manner, or become undeliverable or inaccessible in a timely
manner, the tool will be unable to properly function or their operation may be adversely impacted. The tools’ ability
to use the data may also be adversely impacted by any change in the format of data delivered or acquired by the
tool. The timeliness and quality of a third party’s data may be compromised for a variety of reasons, some of
which are outside of the control of the Adviser and the third-party data provider. A tool’s ability to process data
may also be adversely affected if the Adviser experiences any disruptions to its computing resources or network
connections, including disruption of cloud-based computing resources.
Cybersecurity Risk. As the use of technology has become more prevalent in the course of business, the Adviser
has become more susceptible to operational and financial risks associated with cybersecurity, including: theft,
loss, misuse, improper release, corruption and destruction of, or unauthorized access to, confidential or highly
restricted data relating to the Adviser and its clients, and compromises or failures to systems, networks, devices,
and applications, including but not limited to AI Tools and cloud-based computing resources relating to the
operations of the Adviser and its service providers. Cybersecurity risks may result in: financial losses to the
Adviser and its clients; the inability of the Adviser to transact business with its clients; delays or mistakes in
materials provided to clients; the inability to process transactions with clients or other parties; violations of privacy
and other laws; regulatory fines, penalties, and reputational damage; and compliance and remediation costs, legal
fees, and other expenses. The Adviser’s service providers (including any sub-advisers, administrator, transfer
agent, and custodian or their agents), financial intermediaries, companies in which the client accounts and funds
invest, and parties with which the Adviser engages in portfolio or other transactions also may be adversely
impacted by cybersecurity risks in their own businesses, which could result in losses to the Adviser or its clients.
While measures have been developed which are designed to reduce the risks associated with cybersecurity, there
is no guarantee that those measures will be effective, particularly since the Adviser does not directly control the
cybersecurity defenses or plans of its service providers, financial intermediaries, and companies in which they
14
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
invest or with which they do business. Use of AI Tools may lead to increased risks of cyber attacks or data
breaches and the ability to launch more automated, targeted, and coordinated attacks, due to the vulnerability of
AI technology to cybersecurity threats. Counterparty Risk. An account may have exposure to the credit risk of
counterparties with which it deals in connection with the investment of its assets, whether engaged in exchange
traded or off-exchange transactions or through brokers, dealers, custodians, and exchanges through which it
engages. In addition, many protections afforded to cleared transactions, such as the security afforded by
transacting through a clearing house, might not be available in connection with OTC. Therefore, in those
instances in which an account enters into OTC transactions, the account will be subject to the risk that its direct
counterparty will not perform its obligations under the transactions and will sustain losses.
Liquidity Risk. Investments in some equity, preferred, convertible, debt and privately placed securities,
structured notes, or other instruments may be difficult to purchase or sell, possibly preventing the sale of these
illiquid securities at an advantageous price or when desired. A lack of liquidity may also cause the value of
investments to decline, and the illiquid investments may also be difficult to value.
Geographic and Sector Focus Risk. Certain strategies and funds concentrate their investments in a region, a
small group of countries, an industry, or economic sector, and as a result the value of the portfolio may be
subject to greater volatility than a more geographically or sector diversified portfolio. Investments in issuers within
a country, state, geographic region, industry, or economic sector that experiences adverse economic, business,
political conditions, or other concerns will impact the value of such a portfolio more than if the portfolio’s
investments were not so concentrated. A change in the value of a single investment within the portfolio may
affect the overall value of the portfolio and may cause greater losses than it would in a portfolio that holds more
diversified investments.
High Portfolio Turnover Risk. Certain strategies engage in active and frequent trading leading to increased
portfolio turnover, higher transaction costs, and the possibility of increased capital gains, including short-term
capital gains that are generally taxable as ordinary income.
Initial Public Offering Risk. Initial public offering ("IPO") securities have no trading history, and information
about the companies may be available for very limited periods. The prices of securities sold in IPOs may be
highly volatile and their purchase may involve high transaction costs. At any particular time or from time to time,
the Adviser may not be able to invest in securities issued in IPOs on behalf of its clients, or invest to the extent
desired, because, for example, only a small portion (if any) of the securities being offered in an IPO may be
made available to the Adviser. In addition, under certain market conditions, a relatively small number of
companies may issue securities in IPOs. Similarly, as the number of purchasers to which IPO securities are
allocated increases, the number of securities issued to the Adviser’s clients may decrease. The performance of
an account during periods when it is unable to invest significantly or at all in IPOs may be lower than during
periods when it is able to do so. In addition, as an account increases in size, the impact of IPOs on the account’s
performance will generally decrease.
Primary Risks Applicable to Equity Investments
Real Estate Risk. There are certain risks associated with the development, construction and/or ownership of
real estate and the real estate industry in general, including: the burdens of ownership of real property; local,
national and international economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns,
decreases in government spending and changing government policies); the supply and demand of properties;
the financial condition of tenants and buyers and sellers of properties; changes in interest rates and the
availability of financing which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable; labor
costs; construction materials cost; changes in environmental laws and regulations, planning laws, fiscal and
monetary policies and other governmental rules; environmental claims arising with respect to properties acquired
with undisclosed or unknown environmental problems or with respect to which inadequate reserves have been
established; changes in real property tax rates; changes in energy prices; negative developments in the
economy that depress travel activity; uninsured casualties; force majeure acts, terrorist events, under-insured or
uninsurable losses; and other factors that are beyond the reasonable control of the Adviser. In addition, real
estate assets are subject to long-term cyclical trends that contribute to significant volatility in values.
15
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Many of these factors could cause fluctuations in occupancy rates, development costs, rent schedules, or
operating expenses, causing the value of an investment to decline and negatively affect an investment’s returns.
The value of investments may fluctuate significantly due to these and other factors and may be significantly
diminished in the event of a sudden downward market for real estate and real estate-related assets. The returns
available from investments depend in part on the amount of income earned and capital appreciation generated
by the relevant underlying properties, as well as expenses incurred in connection therewith. If properties do not
generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses, including amounts owed under any third-party
borrowings and capital expenditures, returns will be adversely affected. In addition, the cost of complying with
governmental laws and regulations and the cost and availability of third-party borrowings may also affect the
market value of and returns from real estate and real estate related investments. Returns would be adversely
affected if a significant number of tenants were unable to pay rent or if properties could not be rented on
favorable terms. Certain significant fixed expenditures associated with purchasing properties (such as third-party
borrowings, taxes and maintenance costs) may stay the same or increase even when circumstances cause a
reduction in returns from properties.
Real Estate Securities Risk. The value of securities issued by real estate companies in general, and Real
Estate Investment Trusts (including Real Estate Operating Companies, together "REITs") in particular, are
subject to similar risks as direct investments in real estate and mortgages, and their value will be influenced by
many factors including the value of the properties owned by REITs and the loans and financing owed by REITs.
The loans and financing of a REIT may be subject to the risks of default or of prepayments that occur later or
earlier than expected and such loans may also include so-called “subprime” mortgages. The value of these
securities will rise and fall in response to many factors, including economic conditions, the demand for the
property sector from tenants or users of the building, interest rates and the management skill and
creditworthiness of the issuer. In particular, the value of these securities may decline when interest rates rise and
will also be affected by the real estate market and by the management of the underlying properties. There is no
public trading market for private or public non-traded REITs; therefore, such REITs may be more volatile and/or
more illiquid than publicly traded REITs and other types of equity securities.
Equity Securities Risk. Investments in equity securities (such as stocks) may be more volatile and carry more
risks than some other forms of investment. The price of equity securities may rise or fall because of changes in
the broad market or changes in a company’s financial condition, sometimes rapidly or unpredictably. These
price movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, sectors or industries selected for a
portfolio or the securities market as a whole, such as changes in economic or political conditions.
Growth Investing Risk. Growth investing attempts to identify companies that the Adviser believes will
experience rapid earnings growth. Growth stock prices are generally much more sensitive to current or
expected earnings. Short-term events, such as a failure to meet industry earnings expectations, can cause
dramatic decreases in the growth stock price compared to other types of stock. Growth stocks may trade at
higher multiples of current earnings compared to value or other stocks, leading to inflated prices and thus
potentially greater declines in value.
Value Investing Risk. Value investing attempts to identify companies that, according to the Adviser’s estimate
of their true worth, are undervalued, or attractively valued. The Adviser selects stocks at prices that it believes
are temporarily low relative to factors such as the company’s earnings, cash flow or dividends. A value stock
may decrease in price or may not increase in price as anticipated by the Adviser if other investors fail to
recognize the company’s value or the factors that the Adviser believes will cause the stock price to increase do
not occur.
Smaller Companies Risk. Certain strategies invest in securities of smaller companies. Investments in smaller
companies may be riskier than investments in larger companies. Securities of smaller companies tend to be
less liquid than securities of larger companies. In addition, small companies may be more vulnerable to
economic, market and industry changes. As a result, the changes in value of their securities may be more
sudden or erratic than in large capitalization companies, especially over the short term. Because smaller
companies may have limited product lines, markets or financial resources or may depend on a few key
employees, they may be more susceptible to particular economic events or competitive factors than large
capitalization companies. This may cause unexpected and frequent decreases in the value of an account’s
16
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
investments. Finally, emerging companies in certain sectors may not be profitable and may not realize profits in
the foreseeable future.
Primary Risks Applicable to Fixed-Income, Liquidity and other Debt Investments
Interest Rate Risk. “Interest rate risk” refers to the risk associated with market changes in interest rates. Interest
rate changes may affect the value of a debt instrument indirectly (especially in the case of fixed rate securities)
and directly (especially in the case of instruments whose rates are adjustable). Fixed rate securities, including
preferreds, convertible preferreds, convertible debt, senior unsecured debt and mortgage debt, increase or
decrease in value based on actual and expected changes in interest rates. If actual or expected interest rates
increase, the value of these investments generally declines. On the other hand, if rates fall, the value of these
investments generally increase. Securities with greater interest rate sensitivity and longer maturities generally are
subject to greater fluctuations in value. Variable and floating rate (i.e., adjustable) securities are generally less
sensitive to interest rate changes than fixed rate instruments, but the value of variable and floating rate securities
may decline if their interest rates do not rise as quickly, or as much, as interest rates in general. Many factors can
cause interest rates to rise. Some examples include governmental and tax policies, central bank monetary policy
(such as an interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve), domestic and international economic and political
considerations, fiscal deficits, trade surpluses or deficits, regulatory requirements, rising inflation rates, general
economic conditions and other factors beyond the control of the adviser. It is difficult to accurately predict the pace
at which interest rates will change, or the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes. Any such changes
could be sudden and could expose debt markets to significant volatility and reduced liquidity for securities.
Interest rate sensitivity is generally more pronounced and less predictable in instruments with uncertain payment
or prepayment schedules. This risk will be greater for long-term securities than for short-term securities.
Credit Risk. There is a risk that issuers and/or counterparties will not make payments on securities and
instruments when due or will default completely. Such default could result in losses. In addition, the credit quality
of securities and instruments may be lowered if an issuer’s or a counterparty’s financial condition changes.
Lower credit quality may lead to greater volatility in the price of a security or instrument, affect liquidity and make
it difficult to sell the security or instrument. Certain strategies may invest in securities or instruments that are
rated in the lowest investment grade category. Such securities or instruments are also considered to have
speculative characteristics similar to high yield securities, and issuers or counterparties of such securities or
instruments are more vulnerable to changes in economic conditions than issuers or counterparties of higher-
grade securities or instruments. Prices of fixed income securities may be adversely affected, and credit spreads
may increase if any of the issuers of or counterparties to such investments are subject to an actual or perceived
deterioration in their credit quality. Credit spread risk is the risk that economic and market conditions or any
actual or perceived credit deterioration of an issuer may lead to an increase in the credit spreads (i.e., the
difference in yield between two securities of similar maturity but different credit quality) and a decline in price of
the issuer’s securities.
Equity Investment Conversion Risks. A non-equity investment, such as a convertible debt obligation or
convertible equity, may convert to an equity security. Alternatively, equity securities may be acquired in
connection with a restructuring event related to non-equity investments. An investor may be unable to liquidate
the equity investment at an advantageous time from a pricing standpoint.
C. Risks Associated with Particular Types of Securities
See Item 8.B for a summary of the risks associated with certain types of securities and asset classes.
ITEM 9
Disciplinary Information
A. Criminal or Civil Proceedings
The Adviser has no material civil or criminal actions to report.
17
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
B. Administrative Proceedings Before Regulatory Authorities
The Adviser has no material administrative proceedings before regulatory authorities to report.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization Proceedings
The Adviser has no material SRO disciplinary proceedings to report.
ITEM 10
Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations
A. Broker-Dealer Registration Status
Security Capital is not a registered broker-dealer; however, some of Security Capital’s "Management
Persons" (as defined in Key Terms) are registered with the U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(“FINRA”) as representatives of J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments Inc. (“JPMII”), an affiliated broker-dealer, if
necessary or appropriate to perform their responsibilities.
B. Futures Commission Merchant, Commodity Pool Operator, or Commodity Trading Advisor
Registration Status
Although Security Capital is not registered with the CFTC or a member of the National Futures Association
(“NFA”), certain of Security Capital’s Management Persons are registered with the NFA as associated persons
of an affiliated commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor.
C. Material Relationships or Arrangements with Affiliated Entities
The Adviser has certain relationships or arrangements with related persons that are material to its advisory
business or its clients. Below is a description of such relationships and some of the conflicts of interest that arise
from them. The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to appropriately prevent,
limit, or mitigate conflicts of interest that may arise between the Adviser and its Affiliates. These policies and
procedures include information barriers designed to prevent the flow of information between the Adviser and
certain Affiliates, as more fully described below. For a more complete discussion of the conflicts of interest and
corresponding controls designed to prevent, limit or mitigate conflicts of interests, please see Item 11.B,
Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Other Conflicts of Interest.
Broker-Dealer
J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments Inc.
JPMII serves as placement agent for certain private funds managed by the Adviser. Typically, JPMII does not
receive any placement fees directly from the funds or its investors. A description of the placement agent services
and compensation, if any, payable to JPMII by the funds is set forth in the offering documents for the relevant
fund.
Other Investment Advisers, Commodity Pool Operators, and Commodity Trading Advisors
The Adviser has relationships that are material to its investment advisory business with the following affiliated
investment advisers: J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. ("JPMIM") and J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset
Management Inc. ("JPMAAM"). These affiliated investment advisers are also registered with the NFA as
commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors. The Adviser has a sub-advisory relationship with
18
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
JPMAAM for the management of a certain clients. Additionally, certain of the Management Persons of the Adviser
are also employees of JPMIM.
Banking or Thrift Institution
JPMC, the Adviser’s parent company is a public company that is a bank holding company registered with the
Federal Reserve. JPMC is subject to supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve and is subject to certain
restrictions imposed by the BHCA and related regulations. For a more complete discussion of the BHCA's
restrictions that may apply to the Adviser’s activities please see the disclosure describing Regulatory Risk within
Item 8.B.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMCB") is a national banking association affiliated with the Adviser. JPMCB is
subject to supervision and regulation by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency. JPMCB is also an Exempt commodity pool operator and Exempt commodity trading adviser with the
CFTC. JPMCB provides custody services to certain clients.
Certain functions, such as human resources, legal, compliance, IT, and risk management, are provided through
AM and/or JPMC as shared functions.
Considerations Relating to Information Held by the Adviser and Its Affiliates
JPMAM maintains various types of internal information barriers and other policies that are designed to prevent
certain information from being shared or transmitted to other business units within JPMAM and within JPMC
more broadly. The Adviser relies on these information barriers to protect the integrity of its investment process
and to comply with fiduciary duties and regulatory obligations. The Adviser also relies upon these barriers to
mitigate potential conflicts, to preserve confidential information and to prevent the inappropriate flow of material,
non-public information and confidential information to and from the Adviser, and to other public and private JPMC
lines of business. Material, non-public information ("MNPI") is information not generally disseminated to the
public that a reasonable investor would likely consider important in making an investment decision. This
information is received voluntarily and involuntarily and under varying circumstances, including, but not limited to,
upon execution of a non-disclosure agreement, as a result of serving on the board of directors of a company,
serving on ad hoc or official creditors' committees and participation in risk, advisory or other committees for
various trading platforms, clearinghouses and other market infrastructure related entities and organizations. The
Adviser’s information barriers include, where appropriate: information system firewalls; the establishment of
separate legal entities; physical separation of employees from different business divisions; and written policies
and procedures designed to limit the sharing of MNPI and confidential information.
As a result of information barriers, the Adviser generally will not have access, or will have limited access, to
information and personnel in other lines of business of JPMC. There may be circumstances in which, as a result
of information held by certain portfolio management teams, or others, the Adviser limits an activity or transaction
for certain client accounts or funds, including client accounts or funds managed by portfolio management teams
other than the team holding such information.
For additional information regarding restrictions on trading on MNPI and potential related conflicts of interest,
please see Item 11.A, Code of Ethics and Personal Trading and Item 11.B, Participation or Interest in Client
Transactions and Other Conflicts of Interest.
D. Material Conflicts of Interest Relating to Other Investment Advisers
Security Capital does not recommend or select other investment advisers for clients for direct or indirect
compensation from those advisers. Security Capital does not have business relationships with other investment
advisers that create a material conflict of interest.
19
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
ITEM 11
Code of Ethics, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Personal Trading
A. Code of Ethics and Personal Trading
Security Capital and its registered investment adviser Affiliates have adopted the Code of Ethics for JPMAM (the
“Code of Ethics”) pursuant to Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act. The Code of Ethics is designed to ensure that
Security Capital employees comply with applicable federal securities laws and place the interests of their clients
before their own personal interests at all times. The Code of Ethics imposes certain restrictions on securities
transactions in the personal accounts of covered persons to help avoid or mitigate conflicts of interest, as
described more fully below. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available free of charge to any client upon request by
contacting your client service representative or financial adviser.
The Code of Ethics contains policies and procedures relating to:
•
Account holding reports, personal trading, including reporting and pre-clearance requirements for all
employees of the Adviser;
•
Confidentiality obligations to clients set forth in the JPMC privacy notices;
•
Employee conflicts of interest, which includes guidance relating to restrictions on trading on MNPI, gifts
and business hospitality, political and charitable contributions and outside interests; and
•
Escalation guidelines for reporting Code of Ethics violations.
In general, the personal trading rules under the Code of Ethics require that accounts of employees and
associated persons be maintained with an approved broker and that certain trades in reportable securities for
such accounts be pre-cleared and monitored by Compliance personnel. The Code of Ethics also prohibits certain
types of trading activity, such as short-term and speculative trades. Employees of the Adviser must obtain
approval prior to engaging in all covered security transactions, including those issued in private placements. In
addition, certain employees of the Adviser are not permitted to buy or sell securities issued by JPMC during
certain periods throughout the year. Certain “Access Persons” (defined as persons with access to non-public
information regarding the Adviser’s recommendations to clients, purchases, or sales of securities for client
accounts and advised funds) are prohibited from executing personal trades in a security or similar instrument five
business days before and after a client or fund managed by that Access Person transacts in that security or
similar instrument. In addition, Access Persons are required to disclose household members, personal security
transactions and holdings information. These disclosure obligations and restrictions are designed to mitigate
conflicts of interest that may arise if Access Persons transact in the same securities as advisory clients.
Additionally, all Security Capital employees are subject to the JPMC firm-wide policies and procedures including
those found in JPMC's Code of Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”). The Code of Conduct sets forth restrictions
regarding confidential and proprietary information, information barriers, private investments, outside interests and
personal trading. All JPMC employees, including Security Capital employees, are required to familiarize
themselves with, comply with, and attest annually to their compliance with the provisions of the Code of
Conduct’s terms as a condition of continued employment.
B. Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Other Conflicts of Interest
JPMC Acting in Multiple Commercial Capacities
JPMC is a diversified financial services firm that provides a broad range of services and products to its clients
and is a major participant in the global currency, equity, commodity, fixed income and other markets in which the
Adviser's client accounts invest or may invest. JPMC is typically entitled to compensation in connection with
these activities and the Adviser's clients will not be entitled to any such compensation. In providing services and
products to clients other than the Adviser’s clients, JPMC, from time to time, faces conflicts of interest with
respect to activities recommended to or performed for the Adviser's clients on one hand and for JPMC’s other
clients on the other hand. For example, JPMC has, and continues to, seek to develop banking and other financial
20
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
and advisory relationships with numerous U.S. and non-U.S. persons and governments. JPMC also advises and
represents potential buyers and sellers of businesses worldwide. The Adviser’s client accounts have invested in,
or may wish to invest in, such entities represented by JPMC or with which JPMC has a banking, advisory, or
other financial relationship. In addition, certain clients of JPMC, including the Adviser's clients, may invest in
entities in which JPMC holds an interest, including a JPMorgan Affiliated Fund. In providing services to its clients
and as a participant in global markets, JPMC from time to time recommends or engages in activities that
compete with or otherwise adversely affect an Adviser’s client account or its investments. It should be recognized
that such relationships can preclude the Adviser's clients from engaging in certain transactions and can also
restrict investment opportunities that may be otherwise available to the Adviser's clients. For example, JPMC is
often engaged by companies as a financial adviser, or to provide financing or other services, in connection with
commercial transactions that are potential investment opportunities for the Adviser's clients. There are
circumstances in which advisory accounts are precluded from participating in such transactions as a result of
JPMC’s engagement by such companies. JPMC reserves the right to act for these companies in such
circumstances, notwithstanding the potential adverse effect on the Adviser's clients. In addition, JPMC derives
ancillary benefits from providing investment advisory, custody, administration, prime brokerage, transfer agency,
fund accounting and shareholder servicing, and other services to the Adviser's clients, and providing such
services to the Adviser's clients may enhance JPMC’s relationships with various parties, facilitate additional
business development, and enable JPMC to obtain additional business and generate additional revenue. For
example, allocating a client account’s assets or a JPMorgan Affiliated Fund's assets to a third-party private fund
or product enhances JPMC’s relationship with such third-party investment fund or product and their affiliates and
could facilitate additional business development or enable JPMC or the Adviser to obtain additional business and
generate additional revenue.
The following are descriptions of certain additional conflicts of interest and potential conflicts of interest that may
be associated with the financial or other interests that the Adviser and JPMC may have in transactions effected
by, with, or on behalf of its clients. In addition to the specific mitigants described further below, the Adviser has
adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to appropriately prevent, limit or mitigate conflicts of
interest. In addition, many of the activities that create these conflicts of interest are limited and/or if prohibited by
law, are conducted under an available exception.
JPMC Service Providers and Their Relationships with Issuers of Debt or Equity Instruments held by Client
Accounts
JPMC or the Adviser’s related persons provide financing, consulting, investment banking, management,
custodial, transfer agency, shareholder servicing, treasury oversight, administration, distribution, underwriting,
including participating in underwriting syndicates, brokerage (including prime brokerage), or other services to,
and receive customary compensation from, an issuer of equity or debt securities held by client accounts or
JPMorgan Affiliated Funds managed by the Adviser or the portfolio companies in which such accounts or funds
invest. These relationships generate revenue to JPMC and could influence the Adviser in deciding whether to
select or recommend such investment funds, products, or companies for investments by client accounts or
JPMorgan Affiliated Funds, in deciding how to manage such investments, and in deciding when to realize such
investments. For example, JPMC earns compensation from private funds or their sponsors or investment
products for providing certain services. The Adviser has an incentive to favor such funds or products over other
funds or products with which JPMC has no relationship when investing on behalf of, or recommending
investments to, client accounts or JPMorgan Affiliated Funds because such investments potentially increase
JPMC’s overall revenue. In providing these services, JPMC could also act in a manner that is detrimental to a
client account or JPMorgan Affiliated Fund, such as when JPMC is providing financing services and it determines
to close a line of credit to, to not extend credit to, or to foreclose on the assets of, an investment vehicle or a
portfolio company in which a client account or JPMorgan Affiliated Fund invests, or when JPMC advises a client
and such advice is adverse to a client account or JPMorgan Affiliated Fund. Any fees or other compensation
received by JPMC in connection with such activities will not be shared with the Adviser’s clients. Such
compensation could include financial advisory fees, monitoring fees, adviser fees, or fees in connection with
restructurings or mergers and acquisitions, as well as underwriting or placement fees, financing or commitment
fees, trustee fees, and brokerage fees.
21
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Client Participation in Offerings where JPMC acts as Underwriter or Placement Agent
When permitted by a client’s investment guidelines, objectives, restrictions, conditions, limitations, directions and
cash needs, and subject to compliance with applicable law, regulations, and exemptions, the Adviser from time to
time purchases securities for client accounts during an underwriting or other offering of such securities in which a
broker-dealer Affiliate of the Adviser acts as a manager, co-manager, underwriter or placement agent. The
Adviser’s Affiliate typically receives a benefit in the form of management, underwriting, or other fees.
When a broker-dealer Affiliate serves as underwriter in connection with an initial public offering of securities held
in client accounts or funds managed by the Adviser, JPMC typically requires certain equity holders, including
such client account or fund, to be subject to a lock-up period following the offering during which time such equity
holders’ ability to sell any securities is restricted. In addition, JPMC internal policies or identified actual or
potential conflicts arising from the role of such broker-dealer Affiliate could preclude a client account or fund from
selling into such an offering. These factors could restrict the Adviser’s ability to dispose of such securities at an
opportune time and thereby adversely affect the relevant account or fund and its performance. Affiliates of the
Adviser also act in other capacities in such offerings and such Affiliates will receive fees, compensation, or other
benefits for such services.
The commercial relationships and activities of the Adviser’s Affiliates may at times indirectly preclude the Adviser
from engaging in certain transactions on behalf of its clients and constrain the investment flexibility of client
accounts. For example, when an Affiliate of the Adviser is the sole underwriter of an initial or secondary offering,
the Adviser cannot purchase or sell securities in the offering for its clients. In such case, the universe of
securities and counterparties available to the Adviser’s clients will be smaller than that available to clients of
advisers that are not affiliated with major broker-dealers.
JPMorgan Affiliated Funds' Use of JPMC Service Providers
JPMC faces conflicts of interest when certain JPMorgan Affiliated Funds select service providers affiliated with
JPMC because JPMC receives greater overall fees when they are used. Affiliates provide investment advisory,
custody, administration, fund accounting, and shareholder servicing services to certain JPMorgan Affiliated
Funds for which the Affiliates are compensated by such funds.
Conflicts Related to Advisers and Service Providers
Certain advisers or service providers to clients and funds managed by the Adviser (including investment
advisers, accountants, administrators, lenders, bankers, brokers, attorneys, consultants, and investment or
commercial banking firms) provide goods or services to, or have business, personal, financial, or other
relationships with JPMC and/or the Adviser, their Affiliates, advisory clients, and portfolio companies. Such
advisers and service providers may be clients of JPMC and the Adviser, sources of investment opportunities, co-
investors, commercial counterparties, or entities in which JPMC has an investment. Additionally, certain
employees of JPMC or the Adviser could have family members or relatives employed by such advisers and
service providers. These relationships could have the appearance of affecting or potentially influencing the
Adviser in deciding whether to select or recommend such advisers or service providers to perform services for its
clients or investments held by such clients (the cost of which will generally be borne directly or indirectly by such
clients).
In addition, JPMC has entered into arrangements with service providers that include fee discounts for services
rendered to JPMC. For example, certain law firms retained by JPMC discount their legal fees based upon the
type and volume of services provided to JPMC. The cost of legal services paid by the Adviser’s clients is
separately negotiated and is not included in the negotiation or calculation of the JPMC rate and, as a result, the
fees that are charged to the clients typically reflect higher billing rates. In the event that legal services are
provided jointly to JPMC and a client with respect to a particular matter, the client and JPMC will each bear their
pro rata share of the cost of such services which may reflect the JPMC discount or a higher rate, depending on
the facts and circumstances of the particular engagement.
22
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Restrictions Relating to JPMC Directorships/Affiliations
From time to time, directors, officers, and employees of JPMC, serve on the board of directors or hold another
senior position with a corporation, investment fund manager, or other institution that may want to sell an
investment to, acquire an investment from, or otherwise engage in a transaction with the Adviser’s clients. The
presence of such persons in these circumstances may require the relevant person to recuse themselves from
participating in a transaction, or cause the Adviser, corporation, investment fund manager, or other institution to
determine that it (or its client) is unable to pursue a transaction because of a potential conflict of interest. In such
cases, the investment opportunities available to the Adviser's clients and the ability of such clients to engage in
transactions or retain certain investments or assets will be limited.
In connection with investments on behalf of funds or clients, the Adviser may receive representation on an
Unaffiliated Fund or portfolio company’s board of directors, advisory committee or another similar group, and
may participate in general operating activities. Applicable securities laws and internal policies of the Adviser
could limit the ability of employees of the Adviser to serve on such boards or committees. If employees of the
Adviser serve on a board or committee of an Unaffiliated Fund or portfolio company, such persons may have
conflicts of interest in their duties as members of such board or committee and as employees of the Adviser. In
addition, such persons and such funds or clients will likely be subject to certain investment and trading limitations
if such persons receive MNPI in connection with serving on such boards or committees.
Principal Transactions, Cross and Agency Cross Transactions
When permitted by applicable law and the Adviser’s policy, the Adviser, acting on behalf of its client accounts,
has the ability to enter into transactions in securities and other instruments with or through JPMC, and causes
such accounts to engage in principal transactions, cross transactions, and agency cross transactions. A “principal
transaction” occurs if the Adviser, acting on behalf of its client accounts, knowingly buys a security from, or sells
a security to, the Adviser’s or its Affiliate's own account.
A “cross transaction” occurs when the Adviser arranges a transaction between different client accounts where the
client accounts buy and sell securities or other instruments from, or to, each other. For example, in some
instances a security to be sold by one client account may independently be considered appropriate for purchase
by another client account. In such cases, the Adviser may, but is not required, to cause the security to be
“crossed” or transferred directly between the relevant accounts at an independently determined market price and
without incurring brokerage commissions, although customary custodian fees and transfer fees may be incurred,
no part of which will be received by the Adviser.
An “agency cross transaction” occurs if JPMC acts as broker for and receives a commission from a client
account of the Adviser on one side of the transaction and a brokerage account on the other side of the
transaction in connection with the purchase or sale of securities by the Adviser’s client account. The Adviser
faces potentially conflicting division of loyalties and responsibilities to the parties in such transactions, including
with respect to a decision to enter into such transactions as well as with respect to valuation, pricing, and other
terms. No such transactions will be effected unless the Adviser determines that the transaction is in the best
interest of each client account and permitted by applicable law.
The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures in relation to such transactions and conflicts. In the case of
funds or certain other client accounts, consent may be granted by a governing body or a committee of investors
or independent persons acting for a client account, in which case other investors will not have the opportunity to
provide or withhold consent to the proposed transaction. Where a registered investment company participates in
a cross trade, the Adviser will comply with procedures adopted pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act and
related regulatory authority.
Investing in Securities which the Adviser or a Related Person Has a Material Financial Interest
Recommendation or Investments in Securities that the Adviser or Its Related Persons may also Purchase or Sell
The Adviser and its related persons may recommend or invest in securities on behalf of its clients that the
Adviser and its related persons may also purchase or sell for themselves. As a result, positions taken by the
23
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Adviser and its related persons may be the same as or different from, or made contemporaneously with or at
different times than, positions taken for clients of the Adviser. As these situations involve actual or potential
conflicts of interest, the Adviser has adopted policies and procedures relating to personal securities transactions,
insider trading, and other ethical considerations.
These policies and procedures are intended to identify and mitigate actual and perceived conflicts of interest and
to resolve such conflicts appropriately if they do occur. The policies and procedures contain provisions regarding
pre-clearance of employee trading, reporting requirements, and supervisory procedures that are designed to
address potential conflicts of interest with respect to the activities and relationships of related persons that might
interfere or appear to interfere with making decisions in the best interest of clients, including the prevention of
front running. The Adviser has implemented monitoring systems designed to ensure compliance with these
policies and procedures.
Proprietary Investments by the Adviser and/or its Related Persons - Initial Funding and Seed Investments
In the ordinary course of business, and subject to compliance with applicable regulations, the Adviser or its
related persons from time to time provide the initial funding (“JPMC Seed Capital”) necessary to establish new
funds for developing new investment strategies and products. These funds may be in the form of registered
investment companies or private funds (such as partnerships), or limited liability companies and may invest in
the same securities as other client accounts. JPMC Seed Capital in any such seeded fund can be redeemed at
any time generally without notice as permitted by the governing documentation of such funds and applicable
regulations. Due to the requirements of the Volcker Rule, JPMC Seed Capital is generally required to be
withdrawn within a period of one to three years following the launch of a fund (See Item 8.B, Regulatory Risk). A
large redemption of shares by the Adviser or its related persons could result in the fund selling securities when it
otherwise would not have done so, accelerating the realization of capital gains and increasing transaction costs.
A large redemption of shares could also significantly reduce the assets of a fund, causing a higher expense ratio
and decreased liquidity. From time to time, the Adviser uses derivatives to hedge all or a portion of these seed
capital investments. JPMC Seed Capital may also subject a fund to additional regulatory restrictions. For
example, seeded funds may be precluded from buying or selling certain securities, including IPOs. Where
permitted these funds and accounts may, and frequently do, invest in the same securities as other funds and
client accounts managed by the Adviser. The Adviser's policy is to treat seeded funds and accounts in the same
manner as other funds and client accounts for purposes of order aggregation and allocation.
The Adviser or its related persons may acquire one or more investments in respect of a closed-end fund or client
account before the closing or funding date of such fund or account (each, a "Seed Investment"). On or after the
closing or funding date, the Adviser or its related person will sell the Seed Investment (or a fund interest
attributable to the Seed Investment) to such fund or client account on pre-agreed terms. While the purchase price
may take into account any decline in the fair market value of a Seed Investment, there is no guarantee that a
Seed Investment will not continue to decline in value after the fund or account’s purchase of the Seed Investment.
Regardless of any decline in the fair market value of a Seed Investment, the fund or account may still be required
to bear the closing costs and other expenses relating to such Seed Investment.
Proprietary Investments by Employees’ in JPMAM Pooled Investment Vehicles
Certain of the Adviser's employees, and investment vehicles formed to facilitate investments by the Adviser’s
employees, are permitted to invest directly or indirectly in pooled vehicles managed by the Adviser and they may
benefit from waived, rebated, or reduced fees and the investment performance of those pooled vehicles.
Employees’ investments in private placements or other securities must be pre-cleared. AM compliance is
responsible for reviewing these pre-clearance requests and monitoring the activities of employees holding such
positions for conformity with the Adviser's policies.
The Volcker Rule prohibits or limits the ability of the Adviser and its related persons to engage in certain of these
activities. For a more complete discussion of the Volcker Rule's restrictions please refer to Item 8.B, Regulatory
Risk.
24
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
JPMC’s Policies and Regulatory Restrictions Affecting Client Accounts and Funds
As part of a global financial services firm, the Adviser may be precluded from effecting or recommending
transactions in certain client accounts and may restrict its investment decisions and activities on behalf of its
clients due to applicable law, regulatory requirements, other conflicts of interest, information held by the Adviser
or JPMC, the Adviser’s and/or JPMC’s roles in connection with other clients and in the capital markets, JPMC’s
internal policies, and/or potential reputational risk. As a result, client accounts managed by the Adviser may be
precluded from acquiring, or disposing of, certain securities or instruments at any time. This includes the
securities issued by JPMC. However, with respect to voting proxies on behalf of the Adviser’s clients, the Adviser,
as a fiduciary, will vote proxies independently and in the best interests of its clients, as described in Item 17,
Voting Client Securities.
In addition, potential conflicts of interest also exist when JPMC maintains certain overall investment limitations on
positions in securities or other financial instruments due to, among other things, investment restrictions imposed
upon JPMC by law, regulation, contract, or internal policies. These limitations have precluded and, in the future
could preclude, certain accounts managed by the Adviser from purchasing particular securities or financial
instruments, even if the securities or financial instruments would otherwise meet the investment objectives of
such accounts. For example, there are limits on the aggregate amount of investments by affiliated investors in
certain types of securities within a particular industry group that may not be exceeded without additional
regulatory or corporate consent.
Potential conflicts of interest may also arise as a result of the Adviser’s current policy to seek to manage its
clients’ accounts so that the various requirements and liabilities imposed pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 16” and the “Exchange Act”, respectively) are not triggered. Section 16 applies
to, among other things, “beneficial owners” of 10% or more of any security subject to reporting under the
Exchange Act. In addition to certain reporting requirements, Section 16 also imposes on such “beneficial owner”
a requirement to disgorge “short-swing” profits derived from the purchase and sale or sale and purchase of the
security executed within a six-month period. The Adviser may be deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of securities
held by its advisory clients. Consequently, and given the potential ownership level of the various accounts and
funds managed by the Adviser for its clients, the Adviser may limit the amount, or alter the timing of, purchases
or sales of securities in order not to trigger the foregoing requirements. As a result, certain contemplated
transactions that otherwise would have been consummated by the Adviser on behalf of its clients may not take
place, may be limited in their size or may be delayed.
Restrictions related to Material Non-public Information
The Adviser is not permitted to use MNPI in effecting purchases and sales in public securities transactions. The
intentional receipt of MNPI may give rise to a potential conflict of interest since the Adviser may be prohibited from
rendering investment advice to clients regarding the public securities of such issuer and thereby potentially
limiting the universe of public securities that the Adviser may purchase or potentially limiting the Adviser’s ability to
sell such securities. Similarly, where the Adviser declines access to (or otherwise does not receive or share within
JPMC) MNPI regarding an issuer, the Adviser may base its investment decisions with respect to assets of such
issuer solely on public information, thereby limiting the amount of information available to the Adviser in
connection with such investment decisions. In determining whether or not to elect to receive MNPI, the Adviser
will endeavor to act fairly to its clients as a whole.
Limitations on Investment Activities related to Economic or Trade Sanctions
Furthermore, the Adviser has adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure compliance
generally with economic and trade sanctions-related obligations applicable directly to its activities (although such
obligations are not necessarily the same obligations to which its clients may be subject to). Such economic and
trade sanctions prohibit, among other things, transactions with and the provision of services to, directly or
indirectly, certain countries, territories, entities, and individuals. These economic and trade sanctions, and the
application by the Adviser of its compliance policies and procedures in respect thereof, may restrict or limit a client
account’s investment activities. In addition, JPMC from time to time subscribes to or otherwise elects to become
subject to investment policies on a firm-wide basis, including policies relating to environmental, social, and
corporate governance. The Adviser may also limit transactions and activities for reputational or other reasons,
25
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
including (i) when JPMC provides (or may provide) advice or services to an entity involved in such activity or
transaction, (ii) when JPMC or a client is or may be engaged in the same or a related activity or transaction to that
being considered on behalf of the client account, (iii) when JPMC or a client account has an interest in an entity
involved in such activity or transaction, or (iv) when such activity or transaction on behalf of or in respect of the
client account could affect JPMC, the Adviser, their clients, or their activities. JPMC may also become subject to
additional restrictions on its business activities that could have an impact on the Adviser’s client accounts'
activities. In addition, the Adviser may restrict its investment decisions and activities on behalf of particular client
accounts and not on behalf of other accounts.
Conflicts Related to the Advising of Multiple Accounts
Certain portfolio managers of the Adviser may manage multiple client accounts or investment vehicles. These
portfolio managers are not required to devote all or any specific portion of their working time to specific client
accounts or investment vehicles. Conflicts of interest do arise in allocating management time, services, or
functions among such clients, including clients that may have the same or similar type of investment strategies.
The Adviser addresses these conflicts by disclosing them to clients and through its supervision of portfolio
managers and their teams. Responsibility for managing the Adviser’s client accounts is organized according to
investment strategies within asset classes. Generally, client accounts with similar strategies are managed by
portfolio managers in the same portfolio management team using the same or similar objectives, approach, and
philosophy. Therefore, client account holdings, relative position sizes, and industry and sector exposures
generally tend to be similar across client accounts with similar strategies. However, the Adviser faces conflicts of
interest when the Adviser’s portfolio managers manage accounts with similar investment objectives and
strategies. For example, investment opportunities that may potentially be appropriate for certain clients may also
be appropriate for other clients, and as a result client accounts may have to compete for positions. There is no
specific limit on the number of accounts which may be managed by the Adviser or its related persons. The
Adviser has controls in place to monitor and mitigate these potential conflicts of interest. See Conflicts Related to
Allocation and Aggregation below for further details on this subject.
Conflicts of Interest Created by Contemporaneous Trading
Positions taken by a certain client account may dilute or otherwise negatively affect the values, prices, or
investment strategies associated with positions held by a different client account. For example, this may occur
when investment decisions for one client account are based on research or other information that is also used to
support investment decisions by the Adviser for another client account following a different investment
strategy(ies) or by an Affiliate of the Adviser in managing its clients’ accounts. When an investment decision or
strategy is implemented for an account ahead of, or contemporaneously with, similar investment decisions or
strategies for the Adviser’s or an Affiliate's other client accounts (whether or not the investment decisions
emanate from the same research analysis or other information), market impact, liquidity constraints, or other
factors could result in one account being disadvantaged or receiving less favorable investment results than the
other account, and the costs of implementing such investment decisions or strategies could be increased.
In addition, it may be perceived as a conflict of interest when activity in one client account closely correlates with
the activity in a similar account, such as when a purchase by one client account increases the value of the same
securities previously purchased by another client account, or when a sale in one client account lowers the sale
price received in a sale by a second client account.
Investments in Different Parts of an Issuer’s Capital Structure
A conflict of interest could arise when JPMC or one or more client accounts invest in different instruments or
classes of securities of the same issuer than those in which other client accounts invest. In certain circumstances,
JPMC or one or more client accounts that have different investment objectives could pursue or enforce rights with
respect to a particular issuer in which JPMC or other client accounts have also invested. These activities are
adverse to the interests of such other clients, and transactions for a client account will be impaired or effected at
prices or terms that are less favorable than would otherwise have been the case had a particular course of action
with respect to the issuer of the securities not been pursued with respect to JPMC or such other client account.
For example, if JPMC or a client account holds debt instruments of an issuer and another client account holds
equity securities of the same issuer, and the issuer experiences financial or operational challenges, JPMC, acting
26
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
on behalf of itself or the client account that holds the debt instrument, may seek a liquidation of the issuer,
whereas the other client account that holds the equity securities may prefer a reorganization of the issuer. In
addition, an issuer in which a client account invests may use the proceeds of the client’s investment to refinance
or reorganize its capital structure, which could result in repayment of debt held by JPMC or another client account.
If the issuer performs poorly following such refinancing or reorganization, the account’s performance will suffer
whereas JPMC’s and/or the other account's performance will not be affected because JPMC and the other
account no longer have an investment in the issuer. Conflicts are magnified with respect to issuers that become
insolvent. It is possible that in connection with an insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization, or similar proceeding, a
client account will be limited (by applicable law, courts or otherwise) in the positions or actions it will be permitted
to take due to other interests held or actions or positions taken by JPMC or other clients of JPMC.
Conflicts Related to Allocation and Aggregation
Potential conflicts of interest arise involving both the aggregation of trade orders and allocation of securities
transactions or investment opportunities. Allocations of aggregated trades, particularly trade orders that were
only partially filled due to limited availability, and allocation of investment opportunities raise a potential conflict of
interest because the Adviser has an incentive to allocate trades or investment opportunities to certain accounts
or funds. For example, the Adviser has an incentive to cause accounts it manages to participate in an offering
where such participation could increase the Adviser’s overall allocation of securities in that offering. In addition,
the Adviser may receive more compensation from one account than it does from a similar account or may
receive compensation based in part on the performance of one account, but not a similar account. This could
incentivize the Adviser to allocate opportunities of limited availability to the account that generates more
compensation for the Adviser.
The Adviser has established policies, procedures, and practices to manage the conflicts described above. The
Adviser’s allocation and order aggregation practices are designed to achieve a fair and equitable allocation and
execution of investment opportunities among its client accounts over time, and these practices are designed to
comply with securities laws and other applicable regulations. See Item 12.B, Order Aggregation for a complete
description of the Adviser's allocation and aggregation practices. In addition to the aforementioned policies,
procedures, and practices, the Adviser also monitors a variety of areas, including compliance with account
guidelines, IPOs, new issue allocation decisions, and any material discrepancies in the performance of similar
accounts.
The fairness of a given allocation depends on the facts and circumstances involved, including the client’s
investment criteria, account size, and the size of the order. Allocations are made in the good faith judgment of
Security Capital so that fair and equitable allocation will occur over time. In determining whether an allocation is
fair and equitable, Security Capital considers account specific factors such as, availability of cash, liquidity needs
of the account, risk/return profile of the account, exposure to the security, sector, or industry, and whether the
account is participating in specialized strategies.
Generally, equity orders involving the same investment opportunity or managed by the same portfolio manager
are aggregated and allocated across client accounts at average price, consistent with Security Capital's
obligation to obtain best execution for its clients. If an aggregated order is not fully executed, subject to the
exceptions below, participating accounts will typically be systematically allocated their requested allotment on a
pro rata, average price basis.
Non-pro rata allocations may occur across clients, including in fixed-income securities due to the availability of
multiple appropriate or substantially similar investments in fixed-income strategies, as well as due to differences
in benchmark factors, hedging strategies, or other reasons. For example, partially filled orders for fixed-income
securities cannot always be allocated on a pro rata basis.
Allocations may be adjusted under certain circumstances, for example in situations where pro rata allocations
would result in de minimis positions or odd lots. Furthermore, some clients may not be eligible to participate in an
IPO/new issue where, for example, the investment guidelines for an account prohibit IPOs/new issues, or the
account is owned by persons restricted from participating in IPOs/new issues or other applicable laws or rules, or
prudent policies in any jurisdiction.
27
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Side Letters; Preferential Terms
The Adviser, on its own behalf or on behalf of a fund, from time to time enters into side letters or other similar
agreements with clients in connection with their admission to the private fund managed by the Adviser without
the approval of any other client in the fund. The side letters or other similar agreements have the effect of
establishing rights under, altering, or supplementing the terms of the governing documents of the fund with
respect to one or more such investors in a manner more favorable to such investors than those applicable to
other investors. Such rights or terms in any such side letter typically include, one or more of the following: (i) fee
and other economic arrangements with respect to such investor, including, but not limited to, reductions,
modifications, or waivers of fees and expense caps or partial or total reimbursement or rebate of certain fees,
charges, and/or expenses; (ii) excuse or exclusion rights applicable to particular investments or withdrawal or
transfer rights from the investment vehicle, including as a result of an investor’s specific policies or certain
violations of federal, state, or non-U.S. laws, rules or regulations, such as so- called “pay-to-play” rules with
respect to public pension plan investors, (which may materially increase the percentage interest of other
investors in, and their contribution obligations, for future investments and expenses, and reduce the overall size
of the fund); (iii) additional or modified reporting obligations of the Adviser (or similar managing fiduciary) or other
enhanced information or notice rights for certain investors; (iv) waiver of certain confidentiality obligations,
including where certain disclosures are required by federal or state "sunshine" laws; (v) prior consent of the
Adviser (or similar managing fiduciary) to certain transfers by such investor; and (vi) rights or terms necessary in
light of particular legal, regulatory or policy characteristics of an investor.
Potential Conflicts Relating to Valuation
There is an inherent conflict of interest where the Adviser or its Affiliate values securities or assets in client
accounts or provides any assistance in connection with such valuation and the Adviser is receiving a fee based
on the value of such assets. Overvaluing certain positions held by clients will inflate the value of the client assets
as well as the performance record of such client accounts which would likely increase the fees payable to the
Adviser. The valuation of investments may also affect the ability of the Adviser to raise successor or additional
funds. As a result, there may be circumstances where the Adviser is incentivized to determine valuations that are
higher than the actual fair value of investments.
In addition, the Adviser may value identical assets differently in different funds due to different valuation
guidelines applicable to such private funds or different third-party pricing vendors, among other reasons.
Furthermore, certain units within JPMC may assign a different value to identical assets than the Adviser because
these units may have certain information regarding valuation techniques and models or other information
relevant to the valuation of a specific asset or category of assets, which they do not share with the Adviser.
In addition, securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or are deemed to be unreliable, are
fair valued in accordance with established policies and procedures. Fair value situations could include, but are
not limited to:
•
A significant event that affects the value of a security;
•
Illiquid securities;
•
Securities that have defaulted or are de-listed from an exchange and are no longer trading; or
•
Any other circumstance in which it is determined that current market quotations do not accurately reflect
the value of the security.
ITEM 12
Brokerage Practices
A. Factors Considered in Selecting or Recommending Broker-Dealers for Client Transactions
The Adviser continually assesses the ability of trade execution venues to provide best execution for the
Adviser's client accounts on a consistent basis and in accordance with the Adviser's best execution policies and
28
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
procedures. In order to obtain best execution, the Adviser considers some or all of the following execution
factors, depending on the order, when selecting the most appropriate venue or counterparty:
•
The size of the order relative to other orders in the same financial instrument
•
The need to minimize the possible market impact
•
Access to liquidity/natural order flow
• Whether or not the security is traded on an exchange or OTC
•
The client mandate and client instructions
•
Evaluation of the counterparty, including creditworthiness, among other factors
•
Clearance and settlement reliability and capabilities
•
Commissions rates and other costs
•
Characteristics of the execution venue(s) to which the order can be directed
•
Any other relevant factor
When assessing, the relative importance of these factors, the Adviser will also consider the characteristics of the
client's account, the client’s order, and the financial instruments that are the subject of the order and the execution
venues to which that order can be directed.
Each order executed on behalf of a client account will be unique in its characteristics due to the prevailing market
conditions, liquidity, investment strategy, and investment guidelines at the time such order is executed. While the
relative importance assigned to the execution factors will vary, generally the Adviser prioritizes price and cost
factors (both explicit and implicit) in obtaining best execution. However, there are instances where other factors
take precedence. Such instances may occur under the following circumstances: trade costs are uniform or
negligible across counterparties for equity and fixed-income products, speed of execution may be more important
due to the nature of the order, or a trade order is large in comparison to the liquidity of the relevant financial
instrument in the market.
The Adviser is responsible for determining that the level of commission paid for each trade is reasonable in light of
the service received. Commissions on brokerage transactions may be subject to negotiation. Negotiated
commissions take into account the difficulty involved in execution, the extent of the broker’s commitment of its
own capital (if any), the amount of capital involved in the transaction, and any other services offered by the broker.
1.
Research and Other Soft Dollar Benefits
The Adviser does not enter into soft dollar arrangements. However, the Adviser may receive or have access to
research generally made available by a broker to its trading clients. In addition, the Adviser may consider the
value-added quality of proprietary research received from brokers in allocating trades to brokers that may result
in its clients paying higher rates of commissions to such brokers than might be available from other broker-
dealers or through the use of alternative trading systems.
2.
Brokerage for Client Referrals
The Adviser does not select broker-dealers in order to receive client referrals. The factors used by the Adviser in
selecting broker-dealers in order to execute trades are described above.
3.
Directed Brokerage
The Adviser does not recommend, request or require that clients direct transactions through a specified broker-
dealer. However, under certain conditions, the Adviser may accept written direction from a client to direct
brokerage commissions from that client's account to specific brokers in return for services provided by the
brokers to the client. A client who directs the Adviser to use a particular broker-dealer, including a client who
directs use of a broker-dealer as custodian of client’s assets, should consider whether such a designation may
29
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
result in certain costs or disadvantages to the client. Accordingly, the client should satisfy itself that the broker-
dealer can provide adequate price and execution of transactions.
Where a client directs the use of a particular broker-dealer, it is possible that the Adviser may be unable to
achieve most favorable execution of such client’s transactions, and the client’s account may be disadvantaged
as a result of a less favorable execution price and/ or higher commissions. In addition, less favorable execution
prices and/or higher commissions could result from the client account’s inability to participate in aggregate orders
or other reasons.
Client accounts that direct brokerage may have execution of their orders delayed, since, in an effort to achieve
orderly execution of transactions, execution of orders for client accounts that have directed the Adviser to use
particular broker-dealers may, in certain circumstances, be made after the Adviser completes the execution of
non-directed orders. This delay may negatively affect the price paid or received in the purchase or sale of
securities, respectively, by a client account electing to direct brokerage.
B. Order Aggregation
The Adviser has aggregation and allocation practices in place that are designed to reasonably promote fair and
equitable allocations of investment opportunities among its client accounts over time and to promote compliance
with applicable regulatory requirements. Such practices are designed to reasonably ensure that accounts are
treated in a fair and equitable manner. The Adviser generally aggregates contemporaneous purchase or sale
orders of the same security across multiple client accounts and funds (the “Participating Accounts”). Pursuant to
the Adviser’s trade aggregation and allocation policies and procedures, the Adviser determines the appropriate
facts and circumstances under which it will aggregate trade orders depending on the particular investment
strategy or type of security or instrument and timing of order flow and execution.
In general, orders involving the same investment opportunity are aggregated, consistent with the Adviser's
obligation to obtain best execution for its clients. Partially completed orders will generally be allocated among
Participating Accounts on a pro-rated average price basis. No one account may be systematically favored over
another in the allocation of trade orders. Similarly, accounts are to be treated in a non-preferential manner, such
that allocations are not based upon the client, account performance, fee structure, or the portfolio manager.
When Participating Accounts’ orders are aggregated, the orders will be placed with one or more broker-dealers or
other counterparties for execution. When an aggregated order or block trade is completely filled, the Adviser
generally allocates the securities or other instruments purchased or the proceeds of any sale among the
Participating Accounts, based on such accounts’ relative size. Adjustments or changes may be made and
allocations may be made on a basis other than pro rata under certain circumstances such as to avoid odd lots or
small allocations or to satisfy account cash flows or to comply with investment guidelines. For example, when a
pro rata allocation of an IPO/New Issue would result in de minimis allocation relative to the size of a Participating
Account, such allocation may be reallocated to other Participating Accounts. However, as previously discussed in
the Proprietary Investments by the Adviser and/or its Related Persons - Initial Funding and Seed Investments
section within Item 11.B, seeded funds together with any other funds or accounts deemed ineligible pursuant to
FINRA Rule 5130 are precluded from participating in IPOs and shall not be considered Participating Accounts for
purposes of such IPO/New Issue transactions. In addition, if the order at a particular broker- dealer or other
counterparty is filled at several different prices, generally all Participating Accounts will receive the average price
and where applicable, pay the average commission, subject to odd lots, rounding, and market practice.
Exceptions to Order Aggregation and Allocation Practices
The Adviser does not aggregate orders where aggregation is not appropriate or practicable from the Adviser’s
operational or other perspectives or if doing so would not be appropriate in light of applicable regulatory
considerations. For example, trading instructions or cash flows, among other factors, may result in separate, non-
aggregated trades.
The Adviser may be able to negotiate a better price and lower commission rate on aggregated trades than on
trades that are not aggregated. However, the Adviser is not required to aggregate trades and when trade orders
30
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
are not aggregated, the Participating Accounts will not benefit from a better price and lower commission rate or
lower transaction cost that might have been available had the trades been aggregated.
Account Errors and Resolutions
Account errors, trade errors, and other operational mistakes occasionally occur in connection with the Adviser’s
management of funds and client accounts. The Adviser has developed policies and procedures that address the
identification and correction of such errors and generally require that errors caused by the Adviser and affecting a
client's account be resolved promptly and fairly subject to the considerations set forth below. Errors can result
from a variety of situations, including portfolio management (e.g., inadvertent violation of investment restrictions),
trading, processing, or other functions (e.g., miscommunication of information, such as wrong number of shares,
wrong price, wrong account, raising the order as a buy rather than a sell and vice versa).
The intent of the policies and procedures is to restore a client account to the appropriate financial position as
determined in good faith by the Adviser based on what it considers reasonable in light of all relevant facts and
circumstances surrounding the error. The Adviser makes its determinations pursuant to its error policies and
procedures on a case-by-case basis, in its discretion, based on factors it considers reasonable. Relevant facts
and circumstances the Adviser may consider include, among others, the nature of the service being provided at
the time of the incident, whether intervening causes, including the action or inaction of third parties, caused or
contributed to the incident, specific applicable contractual and legal restrictions and standards of care, whether a
client’s investment objective was contravened, the nature of a client’s investment program, whether a contractual
guideline was violated, the nature and materiality of the relevant circumstances, and the materiality of any
resulting losses. Under certain circumstances, the Adviser may consider whether it is possible to adequately
address an error through cancellation, correction, reallocation of losses and gains or other means.
Consistent with the applicable standard of care, the Adviser’s policies and procedures and client agreements
generally do not require perfect implementation of investment management decisions, trading, processing or
other functions performed by the Adviser. Therefore, not all mistakes will be considered compensable to the
client. Imperfections in the implementation of investment decisions, quantitative strategies, financial modeling,
trade execution, cash movements, portfolio rebalancing, processing instructions or facilitation of securities
settlement, imperfection in processing corporate actions, or imperfection in the generation of cash or holdings
reports resulting in trade decisions may not constitute compensable errors, depending on the materiality and
other facts and circumstances. In addition, in managing accounts, the Adviser may establish non-public, formal
or informal internal targets, or other parameters that may be used to manage risk, manage sub-advisers or
otherwise guide decision-making, and a failure to adhere to such internal parameters will not be considered an
error.
ITEM 13
Review of Accounts
A. Frequency and Nature of Review of Client Accounts
The Adviser performs periodic reviews of client accounts. The Adviser's portfolio managers are generally
responsible for the daily management and review of the accounts under their supervision, including a strategy's
portfolio construction and underlying investments.
The Adviser conducts performance reviews of its clients' accounts. Such reviews examine compliance with clients’
investment objectives and account guidelines, account performance, and the Adviser's current investment
processes and practices. An account review is generally conducted by one or more individuals from the client
service, research, and/or portfolio management teams. Additionally, the Adviser performs monitoring of client
accounts including contributions/withdrawals, custodian reconciliations, and service requests such as tax loss
harvesting.
31
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
The information in this Brochure may not include all the specific review features associated with each investment
strategy or applicable to a particular client account. Clients are urged to ask questions regarding the Adviser’s
review process applicable to a particular strategy or investment product.
B. Factors Prompting Review of Client Accounts Other than a Periodic Review
In addition to periodic reviews, Security Capital may perform reviews as it deems appropriate or otherwise
required. Additional reviews of client accounts may be triggered by client request, compliance monitoring,
guideline monitoring, industry factors, market developments, statutory or regulatory changes and any issues that
may have been identified with respect to a client account. Events that trigger reviews of client accounts are
generally directed to the attention of business management and investment professionals.
C. Content and Frequency of Account Reports to Clients
The Adviser regularly provides written reports to clients that are tailored to the type of investments included in the
client’s account. The Adviser regularly provides one or more of the following types of account reports:
•
A statement of assets (typically monthly or quarterly) including a description of each asset with cost and
current market values;
•
A statement of transactions (typically monthly or quarterly) detailing account activity;
• Quarterly performance reports; or
• Quarterly and audited annual financial statements which include a portfolio overview, investment vehicle
summary, and schedule of investments.
Clients generally have the option of receiving these reports via postal mail or e-mail.
Investors in pooled investment vehicles managed by the Adviser receive reports described in the offering or
organizational document for the relevant vehicle, or as required by law, rule or regulation.
ITEM 14
Client Referrals and Other Compensation
A. Economic Benefits Received from Third Parties for Providing Services to Clients
The Adviser does not receive economic benefits from someone who is not a client for providing investment
advisory services to its clients.
However, the Adviser or its Affiliates derive ancillary benefits from providing investment advisory services to
clients. For more information, see the JPMC Acting in Multiple Commercial Capacities section within Item 11.B.
The Code of Ethics, the Code of Conduct and other related policies and procedures adopted by the Adviser
restrict the receipt of personal benefits by employees of the Adviser or its Affiliates in connection with the Adviser's
business. Subject to strictly enforced compliance policies, in limited circumstances exceptions may be made for
certain nominal non-cash gifts, meals, refreshments and entertainment provided in the course of a host-attended
business-related meeting or other occasion. For more information, see Item 11.A, Code of Ethics and Personal
Trading.
B. Compensation to Non-Supervised Persons for Client Referrals
The Adviser directly or indirectly compensates affiliated referral agents for client referrals in accordance with
applicable laws, including Rule 206(4)-1 under the Advisers Act, when applicable. The compensation generally
consists of a cash payment, computed as a percentage of the Adviser's fees. Such compensation is paid entirely
32
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
out of the Adviser's own resources and therefore does not result in any additional charges to the clients. When the
Adviser compensates an unaffiliated referral agent, it does so pursuant to a written agreement, in accordance with
Rule 206(4)-1.
Additionally, the Adviser or its Affiliates also compensates JPMC employees for referring clients to the Adviser in
accordance with applicable laws.
ITEM 15
Custody
Security Capital does not maintain physical custody of its clients’ assets. Client assets are typically held by a
qualified custodian pursuant to a separate custody agreement. However, pursuant to Rule 206(4)-2 under the
Advisers Act, in certain circumstances the Adviser may be deemed to have custody of client assets. Security
Capital is deemed to have custody of client assets in the following circumstances:
• When Security Capital or a related person acts in any capacity that gives it legal ownership of, or access
to, client assets, (e.g., when Security Capital serves as a general partner, managing member, or
comparable position for certain pooled investment vehicles).
Clients in such private funds will receive the fund’s annual audited financial statements. Such clients
should review these statements carefully. If clients in the private funds do not receive audited financial
statements in a timely manner, they should contact Security Capital immediately.
• When, with respect to certain separately managed accounts, Security Capital or a related person directly
or indirectly holds client funds or securities or has authority to obtain possession of them. Security
Capital is deemed to have custody if it is authorized or permitted to withdraw client funds or securities
maintained with a custodian upon its instruction to the custodian.
Clients will receive account statements at least quarterly directly from their broker-dealer, bank or other
qualified custodian. Separately managed account clients may also receive a statement of assets from
Security Capital. Clients are encouraged to compare the account statements that they receive from their
qualified custodian with those that they receive from Security Capital. If clients do not receive statements
at least quarterly and in a timely manner from their qualified custodian, they should contact Security
Capital immediately.
ITEM 16
Investment Discretion
As described in Item 4.B, Description of Advisory Services, the Adviser provides both discretionary and non-
discretionary investment advisory services. For discretionary mandates, the Adviser and client execute an
investment advisory agreement authorizing the Adviser to act on behalf of the client's account. Execution of such
agreement authorizes the Adviser to supervise and direct the investment and reinvestment of assets in the client’s
account on the client’s behalf and at the client’s risk.
The scope of the Adviser’s discretionary authority is defined by the terms of its written agreement with each client,
which may include certain limitations. These terms include objective and investment guidelines that the client
establishes for the account. For "JPMorgan Funds" (as defined in Key Terms), the Adviser’s investment discretion
may be limited by certain federal securities laws and tax laws that require diversification of investments and
impose other limitations.
For an additional discussion of risks related to the Adviser’s discretionary authority, please refer to Item 6,
Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management.
33
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
ITEM 17
Voting Client Securities
A. Policies and Procedures Relating to Voting Client Securities
For accounts where the client has delegated proxy voting authority to the Adviser, the Adviser has adopted and
implemented policies and procedures pursuant to Rule 206(4)-6 of the Advisers Act that are reasonably designed
to ensure that it votes client securities in the best interest of clients, which procedures include how the Adviser
addresses material conflicts of interest. To ensure that the proxies are voted in the best interests of its clients and
to address material conflicts of interest, the Adviser has adopted detailed guidelines for voting proxies on specific
types of issues (the "Proxy Voting Guidelines"). The Proxy Voting Guidelines address proxy voting with respect to
a wide variety of topics including: shareholder voting rights, anti-takeover defenses, board structure, the election
of directors, executive and director compensation, mergers and corporate restructuring, and social and
environmental issues. The Proxy Voting Guidelines have been developed with input from portfolio managers and
analysts (as applicable) and approved by the applicable proxy committee ("Proxy Committee", as defined below)
with the objective of encouraging corporate action that enhances shareholder value. The Proxy Voting Guidelines
are proprietary to the Adviser and reflect the Adviser's views on proxy matters as informed by its investment
experience and research over many years of proxy voting. Certain guidelines are prescriptive ("Prescribed
Guidelines") meaning they specify how the Adviser will vote a particular proxy proposal except where the Adviser,
pursuant to its procedures, determines to vote in a manner contrary to its Prescribed Guidelines also known as an
"Override". Other guidelines contemplate voting on a case-by-case basis. Individual company facts and
circumstances vary. In some cases, the Adviser may determine that, in the best interest of its clients, a particular
proxy item should be voted in a manner that is not consistent with the Prescribed Guidelines. Clients may obtain a
copy of the Adviser's Proxy Voting Guidelines by contacting their client service representative. In limited
circumstances, if agreed by the Adviser, clients in separately managed accounts may direct the Adviser to vote
the clients' proxies according to the clients' own policies or policies of a third party that are selected by the clients.
In such circumstances, the Adviser provides administrative support but does not have voting discretion.
The Adviser may not vote proxies for which it has voting discretion in certain instances including, without
limitation, when it identifies a material conflict of interest, when securities are out on loan and have not been
recalled, in certain markets that have share blocking or other regulatory restrictions, when the proxy materials are
not available in time for the Adviser to make a voting decision or cast a vote, or for certain non-U.S. securities
positions if, in the Adviser’s judgement, the expense and administrative inconvenience or other burdens outweigh
the benefits to clients of voting the securities.
Proxy Administrator and Proxy Committee
To oversee and monitor the proxy voting process, the Adviser has established a Proxy Committee and appointed
a proxy administrator (the "Proxy Administrator"). The Proxy Committee is composed of members and invitees
including a Proxy Administrator and senior officers from among the Investment, Legal, Compliance, and Risk
Management Departments. The primary functions of the Proxy Committee include: (1) reviewing and approving
the Proxy Voting Guidelines annually; (2) providing advice and recommendations on general proxy-voting matters
including potential or material conflicts of interests escalated to it from time to time as well as on specific voting
issues to be implemented by the Adviser; and (3) determining the independence of any third-party vendor to which
it has delegated proxy voting responsibilities (such as, for example, delegation when the Adviser has identified a
material conflict of interest) and to conclude that there are no conflicts of interest that would prevent such vendor
from providing such proxy voting services prior to delegating proxy responsibilities.
Mitigating Conflicts of Interests
Material Conflicts of Interest
Regulations under the Advisers Act requires that the proxy-voting procedures adopted and implemented by a U.S.
investment adviser include procedures that are reasonably designed to address material conflicts of interest that
may arise between the investment adviser’s interests and those of its clients. In order to maintain the integrity and
independence of the Adviser’s investment processes and decisions, including proxy-voting decisions, and to
34
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
protect the Adviser's’s decisions from influences that could lead to a vote other than in a client's best interests,
JPMC (including the Adviser) has adopted policies and procedures that address (i) the handling of conflicts, (ii)
that establish information barriers and controls for safeguarding confidential information, and (iii) that restrict the
use of MNPI. Material conflicts of interest are further avoided by voting in accordance with the Adviser’s
predetermined Prescribed Guidelines.
Given the breadth of the Adviser’s products and service offerings, it is not possible to enumerate every
circumstance that could give rise to a material conflict. Examples of such material conflicts of interest that could
arise include, without limitation, circumstances in which:
• Management of a client or prospective client, distributor or prospective distributor of its investment
management products, or critical vendor, is soliciting proxies and failure to vote in favor of management
may harm the Adviser’s relationship with such company and materially impact the Adviser’s business;
•
A personal relationship between an officer of the Adviser and management of a company or other
proponent of a proxy proposal could impact the Adviser’s voting decision;
• When an Affiliate of the Adviser is an investment banker or rendered a fairness opinion with respect to the
matter that is the subject of the proxy vote;
Depending on the nature of the conflict, the Adviser may elect to take one or more of the following measures, or
other appropriate action:
•
Removing certain Adviser personnel from the proxy voting process;
•
“Walling off” personnel with knowledge of the conflict to ensure that such personnel do not influence the
relevant proxy vote;
•
Voting in accordance with the applicable Prescribed Guidelines, if any, if the application of the Proxy
Guidelines would objectively result in the casting of a proxy vote in a predetermined manner; or
•
Delegating the vote to an independent third party, if any, that will vote in accordance with its own
determination. However, the Adviser may request an exception to this process to vote against a proposal
rather than referring it to an independent third party (“Exception Request”) where the Proxy Administrator
has actual knowledge indicating that a JPMC affiliate is an investment banker or rendered a fairness
opinion with respect to the matter that is the subject of a proxy vote. The Proxy Committee shall review
the Exception Request and shall determine whether the Adviser should vote against the proposal or
whether such proxy should still be referred to an independent third party due to the potential for additional
conflicts or otherwise.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
In the course of its proxy voting or engagement activities, the Adviser may identify potential conflicts of interests.
To the extent that the Proxy Administrator determines that certain activities give rise to the potential for a material
conflict of interest for a particular proxy vote, the Proxy Administrator shall escalate to the Proxy Committee to
determine if the matter gives rise to a material conflict of interest and if so, what actions should be taken. Sales
and marketing professionals will be precluded from participating in the decision-making process. The resolution of
all potential and actual material conflict issues will be documented in order to demonstrate that the Adviser acted
in the best interests of its clients.
Use of Independent Voting Services
Subject to the oversight by the Proxy Committee. the Adviser may retain the services of independent voting
service providers ("Independent Voting Services") to assist with functions, such as coordinating with client
custodians to ensure that all proxy materials are processed in a timely fashion, recordkeeping, acting as an agent
to execute the Adviser’s voting Guidelines, providing proxy research and analysis, and to provide certain conflict
of interest-related services. In arriving at their voting decisions the Adviser's investment professionals may review
the research provided by a third party such as Independent Voting Services. Such research may include but is not
limited to data, such as comparative data on company peers, background on directors, and company
controversies.
35
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
B. No Authority to Vote Client Securities and Client Receipt of Proxies
If a client chooses not to delegate proxy voting authority to the Adviser, the right to vote securities is retained by
the client or other designated person. In such situations, the client will generally receive proxies or other
solicitations directly from the custodian or transfer agent. The Adviser does not recommend or advise clients how
to vote proxies, nor does it share with clients how it intends to vote proxies for clients for which it has proxy voting
authority.
Proxies for securities that are out on loan normally cannot be voted, as title passes to the borrower of the
securities. For accounts where the client has delegated proxy voting authority to the Adviser, the Adviser is not
responsible for recalling securities to vote proxies for securities that have been loaned from the client’s account
unless the Adviser is directly involved in a client's securities lending arrangement because it is a party to the
client's securities lending agreement and/or the Adviser makes the decision to loan the client's securities or unless
expressly agreed with the client. Please note that the Adviser will not be deemed to be directly involved in a
securities lending arrangement simply because an Affiliate of the Adviser serves as lending agent for a client.
ITEM 18
Financial Information
A. Balance Sheet
Pursuant to SEC instructions, the Adviser is not required to include its balance sheet as part of this Brochure.
B. Financial Conditions Likely to Impair Ability to Meet Contractual Commitments to Clients
The Adviser is not subject to any financial condition that is reasonably likely to impair its ability to meet contractual
commitments to clients.
C. Bankruptcy Filings
The Adviser has not been the subject of a bankruptcy petition at any time during the past ten years.
36
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
Key Terms
1940 Act
: means the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
Access Persons
: means persons with access to non-public information regarding the Adviser's
recommendations to clients, purchases, or sales of securities for client
accounts and advised funds.
Adviser
: means Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated.
Advisers Act
: means the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
Affiliate
: means, with respect to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly,
controls, is under common control with, or is controlled by that Person. For
purposes of this definition, “control” (including the terms “controlled by” and
“under common control with”), as used with respect to any Person, means the
possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct and cause the direction
of the management and policies of such Person, whether through the
ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
AI
: means artificial intelligence.
AI Tools
: means programs and systems that utilize AI, machine learning, probabilistic
modeling, and other data science technologies.
AM
BHCA
: means the Asset Management business of JPMAWM.
: means the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956.
Brochure
: means the Adviser's Form ADV, Part 2A.
CFTC
: means the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Code of Conduct
: means the JPMC firm-wide policies and procedures that sets forth restrictions
regarding confidential and proprietary information, information barriers, private
investments, outside business activities and personal trading.
Code of Ethics
: means the Code of the Ethics of JPMAM, which is designed to ensure that
Security Capital employees comply with applicable federal securities laws and
place the interests of clients first in conducting personal securities transactions.
Dodd-Frank
: means the U.S. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
of 2010, as amended.
ESG
: means Environmental, Social, and Governance factors.
Exception Request
: means a request from an investment professional(s) to the Proxy Administrator
to vote against a proxy where the Proxy Administrator has actual knowledge
indicating that an Affiliate is an investment banker or rendered a fairness
opinion with respect to the matter that is the subject of a proxy vote rather than
refer the vote to an independent third party.
Exchange Act
: means the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Federal Reserve
: means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
FINRA
: means the U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Independent Voting Service : means third-party independent voting service provider.
IPO
: means initial public offering.
JPMAM
: means J.P. Morgan Asset Management, which is the marketing name for the
AM businesses of JPMC.
JPMAAM
: means J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management.
JPMAWM
: means J.P. Morgan Asset & Wealth Management.
JPMC
: means JPMorgan Chase & Co., a publicly traded company, and its affiliates
worldwide.
JPMCB
JPMII
: means JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., an affiliated national banking association.
: means J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments Inc., an affiliated broker-dealer of
Security Capital which serves as placement agent for certain private
investment funds managed by the Adviser.
JPMIM
: means J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
JPMC Seed Capital
: means when the Adviser or related persons provide initial funding necessary to
establish a new fund.
37
Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated
Form ADV | March 21, 2025
JPMorgan Affiliated Funds
: means mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, collective investment funds, and
other pooled investment vehicles managed by Security Capital and/or its
affiliates.
JPMorgan Funds
: means mutual funds or ETFs advised by Security Capital or its affiliates.
Management Persons
: means the Adviser's principal executive officers, directors and the individuals
who determine general investment advice provided to clients.
MNPI
: means material non-public information. MNPI is information not generally
disseminated to the public that a reasonable investor would likely consider
important in making an investment decision.
NFA
: means the National Futures Association.
OTC
: means over-the-counter.
Person
Participating Accounts
: means, with respect to any Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly,
controls, is under common control with, or is controlled by that Person. For
purposes of this definition, “control” (including, with correlative meaning, the
terms “controlled by” and “under common control with”), as used with respect
to any Person, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to
direct and cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
: means multiple client accounts and funds across which the Adviser generally
aggregates contemporaneous purchase or sale orders of the same security.
PMT
: means Security Capital's three-member Portfolio Management Team that
makes all investment decisions.
Prescribed Guidelines
: means certain guidelines that specify how the Adviser will vote a particular
proxy proposal.
Proxy Administrator
: means the professional for the applicable region who is responsible for
oversight of the Adviser’s Guidelines and the proxy voting process including
(along with the Investment Stewardship teams and portfolio management
teams) responsibility for voting proxies as described in the Guidelines.
Proxy Committee
: means the committee for the applicable region that is responsible for oversight
of the Adviser’s proxy voting process.
Proxy Voting Guidelines
: means the detailed guidelines for voting proxies on specific types of issues
including: shareholder voting rights, anti-takeover defenses, board structure,
the election of directors, executive and director compensation, mergers and
corporate restructuring and social and environmental issues.
REIT
: means real estate investment trust.
PG
: means Preferred Growth LLC, and its subsidiary, Preferred Growth
Incorporated.
SEC
: means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Section 16
: means Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Security Capital
: means Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated, which is a U.S.
investment advisory branch of JPMAM.
Seed Investment
: One or more investments acquired by the Adviser or its related persons in
respect of a closed-end fund or client account before the closing or funding
date of such fund or account.
SMA
: means separately managed account.
SRO
: means self-regulatory organization.
Supervised Persons
Volcker Rule
:
: means any of the Adviser's officers, directors (or other persons occupying a
similar status or performing similar functions), or employees, or any other
person who provides investment advice on the Adviser's behalf and is subject
to the Adviser's supervision or control.
refers to § 619 (12 U.S.C. § 1851) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act.
38